[Css-csts] RE: Have BDD issues been covered by BDD proposal?

[Fred Brosi]

John, 

 

The revised version of BDD on the CWE (in http://tinyurl.com/48gpdqx
<http://tinyurl.com/48gpdqx>  ) does cover all issues raised in my
message of 9 February. The 9 February mark-up may be helpful in
understanding the motivation for some of my revisions to BDD, but there
is no need to respond to the  issues raised there.

 

-Fred

 

From: John Pietras 
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 10:11 AM
To: Fred Brosi
Subject: Have BDD issues been covered by BDD proposal?

 

Fred,

After you left the last CSTSWG telecon, the question came up as to
whether the BDD package that you posted to the CWE covered all of the
issues that you raised in your email of 9 Feb. By "covered" I mean that
each raised issue was either resolved and that resolution was
incorporated into the posted version, or if the issue still remains it
is somehow documented (e.g., in a comment) in the posted version. The
bottom line is that they want to know if they can just read the CWE
package or if they still have to review the Feb 9 issues list. Can you
please post the answer to the CSTSWG? Thanks.

 

John

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/css-csts/attachments/20110419/713ed5e3/attachment.htm