[Css-csts] FW: missing negative Bind-Return
John Pietras
john.pietras at gst.com
Mon Mar 1 12:17:20 EST 2010
Tim,
I did a quick check, and the negative Bind return disappeared at or
shortly after the Berlin meeting. That is, it *was* in version 0.15 (the
version used as input in Berlin), but it was removed in version 0.16
(which was issued in early December). The minutes of the Berlin meeting
don't mention this particular change: for Association Control, the
minutes say only "detailed review".
I wasn't present for that part of the Framework review, but perhaps
someone who was might remember why the negative Bind return was deleted
from the state table.
John
________________________________
From: css-csts-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
[mailto:css-csts-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Ray, Timothy J.
(GSFC-5830)
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 11:17 AM
To: css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: [Css-csts] FW: missing negative Bind-Return
Dear WG members,
I don't want the issue raised in this email (below) to fall through the
cracks, so I'm resending it.
Best regards,
Tim
From: Ray, Timothy J. (GSFC-5830)
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 11:29 AM
To: css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: missing negative Bind-Return
Hello all,
Section 3.4.2.2.2 of our Framework specification contains a list of
diagnostics that can be associated with a negative Bind-Return.
However, the Provider state table for the Association Control procedure
does not include any possibility of sending a negative Bind-Return.
Best regards,
Tim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/css-csts/attachments/20100301/26a16db8/attachment.html
More information about the Css-csts
mailing list