[Css-crm] Proposed dispositions to GST and CNES RIDs
Michael Stoloff
Michael.J.Stoloff@jpl.nasa.gov
Mon, 01 Dec 2003 08:22:40 -0800
--=====================_15281413==.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Makes sense to me as well. Thanks for the clarification!
At 08:34 AM 12/1/2003 -0500, Nancy Carney wrote:
>That makes sense to me. I was uncomfortable with these comments simply
>dangling out there for the last year and a half.
>
> Cheers, Nancy
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Hugh Kelliher [mailto:hugh.kelliher@spaceconnexions.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 5:33 PM
>To: Nancy Carney; Michael Stoloff; Css-Crm@Mailman. Ccsds. Org
>Subject: Re: [Css-crm] Proposed dispositions to GST and CNES RIDs
>
>
>
>Hello Nancy and Mike,
>
>
>
>My interpretation is that the "RIDs" we are dealing with at the moment are
>internal CSSA comments that happen to be in RID format. Therefore, I
>suggest we simply send them back to the originators to inform them how we
>have actioned them, as Nancy intends. I think Nancy's dispositions are fine.
>
>
>
>We can then carry on with our internal reviews and generate the pink sheet
>version next spring. This is when the formal RID process starts.
>
>
>
>Does this make sense to everyone?
>
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>
>
>Hugh
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>
>From: <mailto:carney@gst.com>Nancy Carney
>
>To: <mailto:Michael.J.Stoloff@jpl.nasa.gov>Michael Stoloff ;
><mailto:Css-Crm@Mailman.%20Ccsds.%20Org>Css-Crm@Mailman. Ccsds. Org
>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:20 PM
>
>Subject: RE: [Css-crm] Proposed dispositions to GST and CNES RIDs
>
>
>
>Mike,
>
> Good point of order, not a senior moment! But when *should*
> we close the loop with the RIDs? The schedule from October calls for
> this draft to circulate to the working group, then to the area at the end
> of January, then to the secretariat spring 2004 for publication as a pink
> book. Somehow RIDs never entered into the picture&
>
> Now Im confused! Nancy
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael Stoloff [mailto:Michael.J.Stoloff@jpl.nasa.gov]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 3:01 PM
>To: Nancy Carney
>Subject: Re: [Css-crm] Proposed dispositions to GST and CNES RIDs
>
>
>
>Nancy,
>
>Please excuse the following question---I'm afraid I'm having a "senior
>moment"---but I feel a need to clarify a fairly basis point.
>
>It is my understanding that the recent traffic on the Css-crm mailing list
>is to agree on the final contents of the RM Pink Sheets that will be given
>to the Secretariat in order to submit the Pink Sheets formally to the
>Agencies for review.
>
>It is my further understanding that we are *not* dispositioning formal
>Agency RIDs (on previously published Pink Sheets) in order to hand over a
>final Blue Book Issue 2 to the Secretariat.
>
>Am I still in the right ballpark, or have I really lost it completely this
>time?
>
>--Thanks,
> Michael
>
>At 02:34 PM 11/26/2003 -0500, Nancy Carney wrote:
>
>
>Folks,
>
> Please read through the dispositions of these RIDs before I send them
> back to the originators (seems somewhat silly in the case of the GST
> RIDs, but for completenesssake&). For the most part, the changes were
> editorial, but I'd still like for the group to concur.
>
> Thanks! -- Nancy
>
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------
>
>Nancy Carney
>
>Global Science & Technology Inc.
>
>7855 Walker Dr. Suite 200
>
>Greenbelt MD 20770
>
>tel +1 (240) 542-1178 fax +1 (301) 474-5970
>
>
>
>"Nobody can conceive or imagine all the wonders there are unseen and
>unseeable in this world." -- Francis P. Church
>
>
>
>
--=====================_15281413==.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<html>
<body>
Makes sense to me as well. Thanks for the clarification!<br><br>
At 08:34 AM 12/1/2003 -0500, Nancy Carney wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2 color="#993366">That
makes sense to me. I was uncomfortable with these comments simply
dangling out there for the last year and a half.<br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2 color="#993366">
Cheers,
Nancy<br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2 color="#993366"> <br>
</font><br>
<font face="tahoma" size=2>-----Original Message-----<br>
<b>From:</b> Hugh Kelliher
[<a href="mailto:hugh.kelliher@spaceconnexions.com" eudora="autourl">mailto:hugh.kelliher@spaceconnexions.com</a>]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, November 26, 2003 5:33 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Nancy Carney; Michael Stoloff; Css-Crm@Mailman. Ccsds.
Org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Css-crm] Proposed dispositions to GST and CNES
RIDs<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times"> <br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Hello Nancy and Mike,<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times"> <br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>My interpretation is that the "RIDs"
we are dealing with at the moment are internal CSSA comments that happen
to be in RID format. Therefore, I suggest we simply send them back to the
originators to inform them how we have actioned them, as Nancy intends. I
think Nancy's dispositions are fine. <br>
</font><br>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times"> <br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>We can then carry on with our internal reviews
and generate the pink sheet version next spring. This is when the formal
RID process starts.<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times"> <br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Does this make sense to everyone?<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times"> <br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Best regards,<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times"> <br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Hugh<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times"> <br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>----- Original Message ----- <br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2><b>From:</b>
<a href="mailto:carney@gst.com">Nancy Carney</a> </font><br><br>
<font face="arial" size=2><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:Michael.J.Stoloff@jpl.nasa.gov">Michael Stoloff</a> ; <a href="mailto:Css-Crm@Mailman.%20Ccsds.%20Org">Css-Crm@Mailman. Ccsds. Org</a> <br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:20 PM<br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2><b>Subject:</b> RE: [Css-crm] Proposed dispositions to GST and CNES RIDs<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times"> <br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2 color="#000080">Mike,<br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2 color="#000080"> Good point of order, not a senior moment! But when *<b>should</b>* we close the loop with the RIDs? The schedule from October calls for this draft to circulate to the working group, then to the area at the end of January, then to the secretariat spring 2004 for publication as a pink book. Somehow RIDs never entered into the picture&<br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2 color="#000080"> Now <i>Im </i>confused! Nancy<br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2 color="#000080"> <br>
</font><br>
<font face="tahoma" size=2>-----Original Message-----<br>
<b>From:</b> Michael Stoloff [<a href="mailto:Michael.J.Stoloff@jpl.nasa.gov" eudora="autourl">mailto:Michael.J.Stoloff@jpl.nasa.gov</a>]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, November 26, 2003 3:01 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Nancy Carney<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Css-crm] Proposed dispositions to GST and CNES RIDs<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times"> <br>
</font><br>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times">Nancy,<br><br>
Please excuse the following question---I'm afraid I'm having a "senior moment"---but I feel a need to clarify a fairly basis point.<br><br>
It is my understanding that the recent traffic on the Css-crm mailing list is to agree on the final contents of the RM Pink Sheets that will be given to the Secretariat in order to submit the Pink Sheets formally to the Agencies for review.<br><br>
It is my further understanding that we are *not* dispositioning formal Agency RIDs (on previously published Pink Sheets) in order to hand over a final Blue Book Issue 2 to the Secretariat.<br><br>
Am I still in the right ballpark, or have I really lost it completely this time?<br><br>
--Thanks,<br>
Michael<br><br>
At 02:34 PM 11/26/2003 -0500, Nancy Carney wrote:<br><br>
<br>
</font><font face="arial" size=2>Folks,<br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2> Please read through the dispositions of these RIDs before I send them back to the originators (seems somewhat silly in the case of the GST RIDs, but for completenesssake&). For the most part, the changes were editorial, but I'd still like for the group to concur.<br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2> Thanks! -- Nancy<br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2> <br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>-----------------------------------------------------<br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Nancy Carney<br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Global Science & Technology Inc.<br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>7855 Walker Dr. Suite 200<br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Greenbelt MD 20770<br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>tel +1 (240) 542-1178 fax +1 (301) 474-5970<br>
</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2> <br>
</font><br>
<font face="Arial Narrow, Helvetica" size=2>"Nobody can conceive or imagine all the wonders there are unseen and unseeable in this world." -- Francis P. Church<br>
</font><br>
<br><br>
<font face="arial" size=2> </font></blockquote></body>
</html>
--=====================_15281413==.ALT--