[CMC] (no subject)

[Soula Jean-Marc]

no objection

best regards

Jean-Marc Soula
CNES - DCT/OP/C-STA
Advisor, GN Operations
18 Avenue Edouard Belin
31401 Toulouse Cedex 9 - France
Tel.: +33 (0)5 61 2 74647
Fax.: +33 (0)5 61 2 73135
Email: Jean-Marc.Soula at cnes.fr
De : cmc-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org [mailto:cmc-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] De la part de Kearney, Mike W. (MSFC-EO01)
Envoyé : lundi 25 juin 2012 17:51
À : CCSDS Management Council
Cc : Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
Objet : [CMC] (no subject)

CMC members:  The Resources poll for the CMC has passed with 7 agencies voting "adopt".

Unfortunately, one of the charts in my presentation was incorrect.  I said that if a change is made to the resources, the project would automatically switch to "pending" status, until approved in 6 months at the next CMC meeting.  It seems that the system cannot be set up like that.   I discussed this with Brian in Tech Support, and we arrived at the following approach.  This approach also enhances the system by providing an alert to CMC members if a WG chair changes their agency's commitment to either book editor or prototypes.

Prior to "Baselining" (before CMC poll to "Baseline")

·         WG Chairs put initial data in the system for all projects (no FTE needed for existing projects)

·         When a new project is proposed, WG chairs fill out all fields (including FTE), and then they ask for a CMC poll to approve the project.

·         When all projects have data entered, the CMC will have a poll to Baseline the projects and their resources.  At that point, all projects are approved.

After "Baselining",

·         Whenever a WG chair either selects or de-selects an agency (and saves it) in the Resources Edit screen, an alert email will automatically be sent to that agency's CMC delegate.  But that alert email is *ONLY* for selecting Book Editors and Prototypes (the principal resource consumers)

·         The CMC member can then work with the WG team members from his agency to confirm their support or ask the WG chair to remove it.

·         At each CMC meeting cycle when the CMC reviews schedule changes, they will also review all other resource changes (monitor/contribute, etc.)

So, that will replace chart 8 ("More Process Discussion") in the presentation that we voted on in the poll.  I will send the revised PPT out to the WG chairs and CESG in a few days, unless I hear someone that objects to this approach.

I also have clarified some of the other discussions, considering that the WG chairs do not know as much background as the CMC members.   The revised presentation is attached.

   -=- Mike

Mike Kearney
Lead Technology Manager
Mission Operations Laboratory
NASA MSFC EO-01
+1-256-544-2029

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20120626/2871562c/attachment.htm