[CMC] RE : [CESG] Draft-4 CCSDS report to IOAG-11

[Adrian J. Hooke]

At 01:24 AM 6/13/2007, Moury Gilles wrote:
>- slides 17, 18 : options 3 and 5 should not be options proposed by 
>CCSDS for future cross-support by IOAG member agencies' ground 
>infrastructure. Those options are technically unwise (adding 
>unecessary overhead) and violates CCSDS recommended practice for IP 
>packets transfer over CCSDS space links. This position has been 
>expressed by ESA and CNES during the red book review of "IP over CCSDS links"

Gilles: I've included these concerns in the final IOAG report.

///a

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20070614/0b3bf3bb/attachment.html