[CMC] Re: OMG-CCSDS "cover sheet" agreement for XTCE?

[Mario.Merri at esa.int]

I think it is OK.

Regards,

__Mario


                                                                             
             "Adrian J. Hooke"                                               
             <adrian.j.hooke at jp                                              
             l.nasa.gov>                                                  To 
                                        Mario.Merri at esa.int, Nestor Peccia   
             04/01/2007 23:37           <nestor.peccia at esa.int>              
                                                                          cc 
                                        CCSDS Management Council             
                                        <cmc at mailman.ccsds.org>, CCSDS       
                                        Engineering Steering Group - ADs     
                                        <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>             
                                                                     Subject 
                                        OMG-CCSDS "cover sheet" agreement    
                                        for XTCE?                            
                                                                             
                                                                             
                                                                             
                                                                             
                                                                             
                                                                             




Mario/Nestor: please indicate if this is acceptable to the SM&C Working
Group.
CMC Members, Area Directors: this appears to be reasonable. Do any of you
have concerns?

Best regards

Adrian
_____________________________________

From: "Jamie Nemiah" <nemiah at omg.org>
      To: "Adrian J. Hooke" <adrian.j.hooke at jpl.nasa.gov>
      Cc: "Nestor Peccia" <nestor.peccia at esa.int>, <Mario.Merri at esa.int>,
              "Jon Siegel" <siegel at omg.org>
      Subject: RE: OMG-CCSDS "cover sheet" agreement?
      Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:45:25 -0500

      Adrian:

      I understand that the XTCE RTF report is being voted on now. Once the
      vote is complete and the spec is approved by the TF, we will produce a
      clean copy for publication, with our normal introductory language,
      including our standard copyright language, disclaimers, etc.

      We would be pleased to have CCSDS "encapsulate" and publish that
      version, as described below. The only requirements are that:

      (1)  the OMG document be reproduced verbatim, and

      (2)  appropriate copyright acknowledgement (as follows) be given to
      OMG.
                "______[identify items]_______________. Reprinted with
      permission.
                Object Management, Inc. (C) OMG. 2007."
      Please let me know if CCSDS can agree to these terms. If so, I will
      send you a brief email, granting the necessary permissions.

      Best regards,

      Jamie
      ______________________

      James Nemiah
      Senior Vice President
      General Counsel
      Object Management Group, Inc.
      140 Kendrick Ave
      Building A, Suite 300
      Needham, MA 02494
      Tel: 781-444-0404, ext. 151
      Fax: 781-444-0320
      Email: nemiah at omg.org
      URL: www.omg.org
            -----Original Message-----
            From: Adrian J. Hooke [ mailto:adrian.j.hooke at jpl.nasa.gov]
            Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 3:49 PM
            To: Jon Siegel; James Nemiah
            Cc: Adrian J. Hooke; Nestor Peccia; Mario.Merri at esa.int
            Subject: OMG-CCSDS "cover sheet" agreement?
            Importance: High

            Jon and Jamie: I don't remember ever receiving the letter that
            you referenced below, granting CCSDS the rights to "cover sheet"
            OMG specifications. With XTCE coming up for joint publication
            soon, we really need to resolve this.