[CESG] [Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 14 September 2023

[Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de]

Dear All,

As I haven’t seen any reaction on this, I kindly remind the follow-up actions, so that we can close this point and have the corrigendum published quickly.

Thank you all!

Regards,

Tomaso

From: de Cola, Tomaso
Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2025 09:30
To: techsupport at mailman.ccsds.org; 'secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org' <secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>
Cc: cesg at mailman.ccsds.org; Lux, Jim (US 3370) <james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.gov>; Bob Durst <durst at mitre.org>
Subject: FW: [Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 14 September 2023

Dear All,

More than 1 year ago, a resolution for a corrigendum to be applied to CCSDS 734.1-B-1 (Licklider Transmission Protocol (LTP) for CCSDS) was issued with a corresponding CESG poll, which resulted in some conditions raised by Peter. After a few iterations with him and the new SEA AD (Jim here in cc), all the raised conditions have been successfully implemented in the revised version of the corrigendum. Attached you can find the new version of the document (in track-changes, showing the changes part of the corrigendum request) and the email exchange between Bob and Jim confirming that the process can be closed. As such, we can now move on with the instruction of the CMC poll towards the final approval for the publication. To this end, I kindly ask the new tech editors to format the new version of the document and prepare the errata-corrige to be applied at the beginning of the document.

Should you have any questions, please let me know,

Best Regards,

Tomaso

From: SIS-DTN <sis-dtn-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sis-dtn-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>> On Behalf Of Tomaso de Cola via SIS-DTN
Sent: Freitag, 15. September 2023 22:05
To: durst at mitre.org<mailto:durst at mitre.org>
Cc: sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: [Sis-dtn] Fwd: [Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 14 September 2023

CESG review of LTP corrigendum completed. One condition from Peter:

Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions):  The registration process defined in Sec 3.6 of this document is completely inadequate for the purpose.  "LTP Engine IDs" are allocated by the SANA.  So far so good.  But the SANA LTP Engine Registry (https://sanaregistry.org/r/ltp_engineid/) only records a range of numbers assigned to some organization.  There is no: 1) PoC at that organization to make a request of, 2) guidance as to how those numbers are assigned nor what records must be kept, 3) registry of assigned IDs, 4) ""location of assigned IDs.  This really must be fixed if this is to be a useful operational registry.

To be discussed in next telcos

Tomaso
Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:
From: CCSDS Secretariat via CESG-All <cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Date: 15. September 2023 at 20:56:37 CEST
To: cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org>
Cc: CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net<mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>>
Subject: [Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 14 September 2023
Reply-To: secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>
Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions):  The registration process defined in Sec 3.6 of this document is completely inadequate for the purpose.  "LTP Engine IDs" are allocated by the SANA.  So far so good.  But the SANA LTP Engine Registry (https://sanaregistry.org/r/ltp_engineid/) only records a range of numbers assigned to some organization.  There is no: 1) PoC at that organization to make a request of, 2) guidance as to how those numbers are assigned nor what records must be kept, 3) registry of assigned IDs, 4) ""location of assigned IDs.  This really must be fixed if this is to be a useful operational registry.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20250626/1598104d/attachment.htm>