[CESG] CESG-P-2024-01-002 Approval to release CCSDS 508.0-P-1.1, Conjunction Data Message (Pink Book, Issue 1.1) for CCSDS Agency review

[CCSDS Secretariat]

Dear CESG Members,

Conditions for approval of CCSDS 508.0-P-1.1, Conjunction Data Message (Pink Book, Issue 1.1) have been disposed to the satisfaction of the AD(s) who voted to approve with conditions. The Secretariat will now proceed with CMC polling to authorize release for Agency review.
-------------- next part --------------
From:	Shames, Peter M (US 312B) <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
Sent:	Wednesday, March 06, 2024 4:28 PM
To:	Berry, David S (US 3920); Tom Gannett
Cc:	Howie Weiss
Subject:	Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Comments on CDM P-1.1 Pink Book

Categories:	Poll Condition Closure

David & Tom,

In the interest of getting the CDM “out on the street” I am willing to let it go out with the current 
security section.  On the condition that the issues that I have raised, and anything that Howie has to add, 
will get updated as a part of the Agency Review RID Disposition process.  I do not much like this 
approach, but it will be more expeditious.

Thanks, Peter


From: David Berry <david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov> 
Date: Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 3:17?PM 
To: Peter Shames <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov> 
Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] RE: Comments on CDM P-1.1 Pink Book


Peter: 

CDM still in limbo. I sent the document to Howie, as I stated, and he said he would look at it. I 
envisioned entering his comments as RIDs. I think Tom thinks you want the Security Section 
revised before proceeding.

Can you clarify for the 3 of us?

Thx
David


From: Thomas Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> 
Date: Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 2:40 PM 
To: David Berry <david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov> 
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Comments on CDM P-1.1 Pink Book

I need an explicit statement from Peter that all his conditions are satisfied. Currently we are in the “I do 
think that there are still a few issues, particularly in the Security section, that need to be addressed” 
phase.


Logothete, L.L.C.
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
+1 443 472 0805

From: Berry, David S (US 3920) [mailto:david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov]  
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2024 5:14 PM 
To: Tom Gannett 
Subject: Re: Comments on CDM P-1.1 Pink Book


Tom:

I still see our CDM P-1.1 CESG Poll in the list of "Closed CESG Polls with Conditions still 
Pending/Unsatisfied"...  I guess I thought I had satisfied Peter's conditions and that he had 
agreed to allow the document to proceed to the CMC Poll. Is there something more that I need 
to do?

Just checking because I have a Nav WG telecon tomorrow morning and I want to give the 
correct status...

Thx!
David



From: David Berry <david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov> 
Date: Friday, March 1, 2024 at 2:19 PM 
To: "Shames, Peter M (US 312B)" <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov> 
Cc: Tom Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> 
Subject: Re: Comments on CDM P-1.1 Pink Book


Peter:

I will forward the Agency Review draft to Howie Weiss and request that he take a look at the 
Security section of the document. Once the Agency Review starts, his comments will be entered 
as RIDs.

Thanks
David


From: "Shames, Peter M (US 312B)" <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov> 
Date: Thursday, February 29, 2024 at 5:57 PM 
To: David Berry <david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov> 
Cc: Tom Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> 
Subject: Re: Comments on CDM P-1.1 Pink Book

Hi David,

It appears that I made a mistake and somehow reviewed an old copy of the document.  It also appears 
that many of the issues I identified, particularly with the SANA registries, have been remedied.  My 
apologies to you for screwing up and for any unnecessary angst that my comments might have caused.

See attached.

I do think that there are still a few issues, particularly in the Security section, that need to be 
addressed.  If you will agree to address these as part of the Agency review I will agree to let it go out as 
it is.  I do not know if anyone else will pick up on this.

Best regards, Peter


From: David Berry <david.s.berry at jpl.nasa.gov> 
Date: Wednesday, February 28, 2024 at 5:37?PM 
To: Peter Shames <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov> 
Subject: Comments on CDM P-1.1 Pink Book


Peter:

I haven't yet received the official results of the CDM P-1.1 Pink Book CESG Poll to approve 
Agency Review, but I've prepared and attached some responses to the Conditions you've placed 
on proceeding. 

I've also attached a copy of the Pink Book that was attached to the Poll, with 3 artifacts 
addressing your comment #1. I could have made more, obviously, but this shows what is 
possible.

Several of your comments make me wonder if you were in fact reviewing the document 
attached to the poll (?).

Regards,
David