[CESG] Unresolved Poll CESG-P-2019-12-002 Approval to release CCSDS 131.3-P-1.1, CCSDS Space Link Protocols over ETSI DVB-S2 Standard (Pink Sheets, Issue 1.1) for CCSDS Agency review

[Margherita.di.Giulio at esa.int]

Dear Gilles,
I  will forward your escalation request to CMC  following a discussion 
that will be put in the Agenda of the next CESG Telecon (10th March) 

To this end:
@ SLS AD and SLS DAD : please prepare one slide  that summaries the issue
@ SEA AD : please prepare one slide to explain the reason for the 
"condition" issued at the CESG Poll 


By the way, the CMC Teleconference will take place the day after our CESG 
Telecon (that is, it will take place on 11 March) 
In that occasion, I will first introduce the topic and will then present 
the two slides above.

I will then report to CESG about the outcome.

Kind regards,
Margherita
--------------------------------------------------------------
Margherita di Giulio
Ground Station Systems Division
Backend Software Section (OPS-GSB)


European Space Agency ESA/ESOC
Robert-Bosch-Str. 5
D-64293 Darmstadt - Germany
Tel: +49-6151-902779
e-mail: Margherita.di.Giulio at esa.int





From:   "Moury Gilles" <Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr>
To:     "Margherita.di.Giulio at esa.int" <Margherita.di.Giulio at esa.int>
Cc:     "CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec" 
<cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>, "Massimo.Bertinelli at esa.int" 
<Massimo.Bertinelli at esa.int>
Date:   25/02/2020 16:13
Subject:        [CESG] Unresolved Poll CESG-P-2019-12-002 Approval to 
release CCSDS 131.3-P-1.1, CCSDS Space Link Protocols over ETSI DVB-S2 
Standard (Pink Sheets, Issue 1.1) for CCSDS Agency review



Dear Margherita,

After a long and painful discussion about SEA condition to CESG Poll 
CESG-P-2019-12-002 Approval to release CCSDS 131.3-P-1.1, CCSDS Space Link 
Protocols over ETSI DVB-S2 Standard (Pink Sheets, Issue 1.1) for CCSDS 
Agency review, it has not been possible to reach a positive conclusion.

SLS Area considering that:

1) no PID on the document was reported as condition
2) making the Agency Review conditional on input (agreed by the C&S WG and 
SLS Area but) not provided by the Book Editor of another Agency is not 
legitimate
3) the main coordination issues requested by SEA AD are already approved 
in the WG but misses the input by the relevant Book Editors
4) the e-mail discussion involved CCSDS Areas

requests escalation of this issue to CMC.

Best regards

SLS Area AD & DAD
 
 
 


This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20200226/da2d940f/attachment.htm>