[CESG] CESG-P-2018-06-004 Approval to release CCSDS 350.8-P-1.1, Information Security Glossary of Terms (Proposed Pink Book, Issue 1.1) for CCSDS Agency review

Mon Jul 23 20:47:46 UTC 2018

Dear CESG Members,

Conditions for approval of CESG-P-2018-06-004 Approval to release CCSDS
350.8-P-1.1, Information Security Glossary of Terms (Proposed Pink Book,
Issue 1.1) for CCSDS Agency review have been disposed to the satisfaction of
the AD(s) who voted to approve with conditions. The Secretariat will now
proceed with CMC polling to authorize release for CCSDS Agency review.

Logothete, L.L.C.

thomas.gannett at tgannett.net

+1 443 472 0805

From: Mario.Merri at esa.int [mailto:Mario.Merri at esa.int] 
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2018 4:12 AM
To: Weiss, Howard
Cc: Brigitte.Behal at cnes.fr; Peter M Shames, (313B); CCSDS Secretariat; CCSDS
Secretariat
Subject: Re: Result of CESG-P-2018-06-004 Approval to release CCSDS
350.8-P-1.1

Hi Howie, 

actually mine was more a question than a condition. I understand that your
proposed approach is practical and potentially temporary until the SANA
glossary eventually takes over, which might take some time. I see and
appreciate that in the area of security you are promoting terminology
harmonisation with this document. Based on this, I am OK with it. 

Regards, 

__Mario 

From:        "Weiss, Howard" <Howard.Weiss at parsons.com> 
To:        "Mario.Merri at esa.int" <Mario.Merri at esa.int>,
"Brigitte.Behal at cnes.fr" <Brigitte.Behal at cnes.fr> 
Cc:        CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>, "Peter M Shames,
(313B)" <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, CCSDS Secretariat
<secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org> 
Date:        12/07/2018 15:23 
Subject:        Re: Result of CESG-P-2018-06-004 Approval to release CCSDS
350.8-P-1.1 

  _____  

Mario and Brigitte,

Concerning your conditional approval of the release of the Security
Glossary, indeed this document is only a glossary of terms.  However, the
rationale for creating such a glossary was to eliminate duplication of
security glossaries in each security WG document published.

All terms in the existing SANA Glossary are defined in CCSDS documents; the
definitions in those documents are the source of the SANA Glossary. Many
terms in the SANA glossary, which was created via document search, are dated
and incorrect because there was no human intervention in its creation.

The update to the Security Glossary is an actual update to the existing
Security Glossary.  Even if it were someday decided to retire the Security
Glossary in favor of a SANA-only glossary, the update would still have to
occur first.

The change in document color is happening in conjunction with the update,
but it is not what the CESG is being asked to approve (the CMC already
approved the change in color).

Therefore, I believe that the condition is actually not a condition that
applies to the document update and should be withdrawn.

regards

howie

________________________________
Howard Weiss, CISSP

PARSONS, Inc.
7110 Samuel Morse Drive
Columbia, MD 21046
443-430-8089 (office)
443-494-9087 (cell)
443-430-8238 (fax)
howard.weiss at parsons.com
www.parsons.com

Please consider the environment before printing this message

________________________________________
From: CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
Sent: Sunday, July 8, 2018 4:12 PM
To: Weiss, Howard
Cc: Mario.Merri at esa.int; Brigitte.Behal at cnes.fr
Subject: Result of CESG-P-2018-06-004 Approval to release CCSDS  350.8-P-1.1

Howie:

The CESG poll below closed with conditional approval. Please
negotiate resolution of the conditions directly with the ADs who
voted "Approve with Conditions" and CC the Secretariat on all related
correspondence.

Tom

>CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2018-06-004 Approval to release CCSDS
>350.8-P-1.1, Information Security Glossary of Terms (Proposed Pink
>Book, Issue 1.1) for CCSDS Agency review
>Results of CESG poll beginning 20 June 2018 and ending 5 July 2018:
>
>                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
>  Approve Unconditionally:  4 (66.67%) (Barkley, Shames, Burleigh, Wilmot)
>  Approve with Conditions:  2 (33.33%) (Merri, Behal)
>  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
>
>CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
>
>Mario Merri (Approve with Conditions): Since this book it is merely
>a glossary of terms, it is not clear to me why it has not been taken
>this opportunity to silverise the original GB and put the terms in
>SANA at
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__sanaregistry.org_r_ter
ms_records_104&d=DwIBAg&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r=dT3K
0y3n0RD9-56k-UVMPMP98PIQRd2Kzfa-AwqQOww&m=rnu9zv4DqTmekzXe8xD5LHJneLR8Gm4ZEL
MHBByjL24&s=GvSF5aCKsj0IpW9COmZ_rcPpKXFYBa9fyc9--EbyZTY&e=>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__sanaregistry.org_r_term
s_records_104&d=DwIBAg&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r=dT3K0
y3n0RD9-56k-UVMPMP98PIQRd2Kzfa-AwqQOww&m=rnu9zv4DqTmekzXe8xD5LHJneLR8Gm4ZELM
HBByjL24&s=GvSF5aCKsj0IpW9COmZ_rcPpKXFYBa9fyc9--EbyZTY&e=
>
>Bigette Behal (Approve with Conditions): cf. MOIMS AD
>
>
>Total Respondents: 6
>No response was received from the following Area(s):
>
>SLS
>
>SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
>PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after
>conditions have been addressed
>

NOTICE: This email message and all attachments transmitted with it may
contain privileged and confidential information, and information that is
protected by, and proprietary to, Parsons Corporation, and is intended
solely for the use of the addressee for the specific purpose set forth in
this communication. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is
strictly prohibited, and you should delete this message and all copies and
backups thereof. The recipient may not further distribute or use any of the
information contained herein without the express written authorization of
the sender. If you have received this message in error, or if you have any
questions regarding the use of the proprietary information contained
therein, please contact the sender of this message immediately, and the
sender will provide you with further instructions.

This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may
contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or
dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies
appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data
Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20180723/9165afb4/attachment.html>