[CESG] FW: Results of CESG Polls closing 19 January 2018

[Thomas Gannett]

Dear CESG members,

 

Conditions for approval of CESG-P-2017-12-002 Approval to publish CCSDS 506.0-M-2, Delta-Differential One Way Ranging (Delta-DOR) Operations (Magenta Book, Issue 2) have been addressed to the satisfaction of the AD who voted to approve with conditions. The CMC poll has since been conducted, and the Secretariat will proceed with publication of the document.

 

 

Logothete, L.L.C.

thomas.gannett at tgannett.net

+1 443 472 0805

 

From: Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int [mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int] 
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 6:55 PM
To: Thomas Gannett
Cc: Mattia.Mercolino at esa.int; peter.shames at jpl.nasa.gov
Subject: Re: Results of CESG Polls closing 19 January 2018

 

Ok for me. 

Thanks

Sent from my iPhone


On 26. Jan 2018, at 22:19, Thomas Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> wrote:

Gian Paolo:

 

I have added the following note:

 

“The parameters defined in table 6-1 for issue 2 of this Recommended Practice differ in definition and number from those defined in issue 1; in particular, many new parameters have been defined in the current issue. For that reason implementations based on the original issue of this document would not be compatible with implementations based on this issue, and vice versa. Because there are no known implementations based on issue 1, however, no problem with incompatibility is foreseen, as future implementations will follow the current definitions.”

 

Also, the Document Control page now has the following:

 

Current issue:

Changes compatible with previous issue:

–  adds clarifications

–  renames ‘Service Request’ to ‘Support Request’

–  adds examples of Support Requests as new annex

–  deletes section 7 in favor of new reference to proposed Delta-DOR Quasar Catalog

Changes not compatible with previous issue:

–  adds subsection on quantitative validation criteria

–  adds Support Request specifications

–  adds, modifies parameters for the DDOR Ground Observation Event Sequence

 

Please advise if that satisfies your condition.

 

Tom

 

 

Logothete, L.L.C.

thomas.gannett at tgannett.net

+1 443 472 0805

 

From: Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int [mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int] 
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 3:47 AM
To: Thomas Gannett
Cc: Mattia.Mercolino at esa.int; peter.shames at jpl.nasa.gov
Subject: Re: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 19 January 2018

 

Tom, 
        I had a word with Mattia and your proposed text is highly appreciated. 
I wish you all a nice week end 

Gippo 



From:        Thomas Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> 
To:        Mattia.Mercolino at esa.int, peter.shames at jpl.nasa.gov, Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int 
Date:        23/01/2018 21:10 
Subject:        Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 19 January 2018 

  _____  




All:

If someone wants to provide wording for the note proposed in the 
condition (below), I will gladly move forward to CMC approval. 
Otherwise please advise if I have to do it myself.

Best regards,
Tom

>CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2017-12-002 Approval to publish CCSDS 
>506.0-M-2, Delta-Differential One Way Ranging (Delta-DOR) Operations 
>(Magenta Book, Issue 2)
>Results of CESG poll beginning 29 December 2017 and ending 19 January 2018:
>
>                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
>  Approve Unconditionally:  6 (85.71%) (Barkley, Merri, Behal, 
> Shames, Burleigh, Wilmot)
>  Approve with Conditions:  1 (14.29%) (Calzolari)
>  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
>
>CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
>
>Gian Paolo Calzolari (Approve with Conditions): Table 6-1 changed a 
>lot form the version in the Magenta Book Issue 1. In normal 
>conditions this would require an explanation on how the user can 
>understand whether the parameters are provided according to Magenta 
>Book Issue 1 or according to Magenta Book Issue 2.
>
>It is understood that this is not explained as there is no 
>impleemtation according to Magenta Book Issue 1.
>
>Despite the document provides no change bars (somehow hiding the 
>changes to this table), I still think a note is needed to explain 
>why no user need to care that the format has been changed.

Thomas Gannett
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
+1 443 472 0805 





This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
 
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
 

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
 
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20180212/bb7c72a1/attachment.html>