[CESG] CESG polls stucked with ADs/DADs conditions

[Shames, Peter M (312B)]

Gippo, et al,

Just to be entirely clear.  My condition was to ask that the document meet the terms and maturity status required of all documents to be sent out for agency review.  I did not "REJECT" it, I asked that it be completed, as required.

Dear Massimo,

Since the document itself says "For systems compliant with CCSDS 131.0-B-2 further work is needed. " I think it is clear that the WG understands that the document is not yet complete.  I think it wisest to use the available time and effort to remedy that, and when it is complete, and at an adequate level of maturity, it should then be proposed again for agency review.

Best regards, Peter

It is up to the WG to meet the usual maturity conditions such that the document does not include statements like that.  I think the correct characterization is that the WG chose to WITHDRAW the document because it is not mature, and they could not remedy that in time, and not that it was rejected.

Best regards, Peter



From: CESG <cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> on behalf of Gian Paolo Calzolari <Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>
Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 2:44 AM
To: Nestor Peccia <Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>
Cc: "Massimo.Bertinelli at esa.int" <Massimo.Bertinelli at esa.int>, Kenneth Andrews <kenneth.s.andrews at jpl.nasa.gov>, Klaus-Juergen Schulz <Klaus-Juergen.Schulz at esa.int>, Bernie Edwards <Bernard.L.Edwards at nasa.gov>, CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: Re: [CESG] CESG polls stucked with ADs/DADs conditions

Nestor,
        For the SLS VCM Protocol RB it has been clarified that the SEA Condition was actually a REJECT.
SLS disagreement was expressed in mail dated 08/08/2017 14:30

For SLS Optical Comm Physical Layer RB the WG is working on replies to the conditions.

Regards

Gian Paolo

PS The relevant WG chairs are copied here for information with the request to not do reply to all.



From:        Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
To:        "CESG -- CCSDS-Engineering Steering Group \(cesg at mailman.ccsds.org\) \(cesg at mailman.ccsds.org\)" <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Date:        05/09/2017 11:12
Subject:        [CESG] CESG polls stucked with ADs/DADs conditions
Sent by:        "CESG" <cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>
________________________________



Dear all,

There are 6 CESG closed polls with "not yet solved" conditions. The 6 polls are on documents to be issued for Agency Review.
i.e.
1.        SLS VCM Protocol RB
2.        SLS Optical Comm Physical Layer RB
3.        CSS Guidelines for spec of CSTS RB
4.        MOIMS MO MAL Binding to ZMTP transport
5.        MOIMS MO Data Product bDistribution RB
6.        MOIMS MO Common Services RB

It means that we have missed the opportunity to discuss the potential RIDs at the F17 meeting in Netherlands.

ciao
nestor
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

_______________________________________________
CESG mailing list
CESG at mailman.ccsds.org
https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg


This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.

The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its

content is not permitted.

If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.

Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.



Please consider the environment before printing this email.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20170905/f9df91e5/attachment.html>