[CESG] Fw: AW: [CMC] CESG Report to CMC

[Barkley, Erik J (3970)]

Nestor,

Please see below for my responses.

-Erik

From: CESG [mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 6:42 AM
To: CESG -- CCSDS-Engineering Steering Group(cesg at mailman.ccsds.org)(cesg at mailman.ccsds.org) <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: [CESG] Fw: AW: [CMC] CESG Report to CMC

Dear all,

Please see your actions for clarification   Your final updates by Friday 9th June COB (USA PST).

I am leaving on Saturday afternoon for Sant Petersburg. I will produce the last CESG presentation update by Saturday noon.

ciao
nestor

-----------------------------------------------------

Page 3: I would delete the SIS voice here, the problem is the secretariat, not the WG. I would not blame the secretariat for the delays, there were contract problems and some inconsistencies and 3 years delay is a little bit too much, but if the WG is accepting that, we should not complain against the secretariat, they are doing a great job. Nestor to clarify

Page 8: What are the "data quality" issues mentioned                Peter to clarify

Page 26: Are there any proposals from the WG/agencies for new chair/deputy?  Erik to clarify

EB: ESA has nominated Holger Driehahn to chair the CSTS working group.  The current CNES deputy chair as indicated that he plans to retire by spring of next year. There is currently no nominee from any agency with regard to the deputy chair position.

Page 33: Is that a question to IOAG or within the WG. What kind of file service is planned by the area.   Erik to clarify

EB: it is a question to CMC. Does the CMC wish to expend resources developing a standardized recommendation for these kind of services for interoperability? Currently the only recommendation that the area is working on is the Generic Terrestrial File Transfer.  This is simply an interoperable standardized file transfer from point A to point B. No further services envisioned. The description of the services indicated here implies a further processing such as taking the transferred file and then transforming it into a CFDP file for uplink assuming a CFDP endpoint at the ground station etc.

Page 36: Are the resources for the second CFDP prototype still missing? Comments on page 39/49  Scott to clarify

Page 60: The WG requests the CCSDS management to formalize the WG membership. Is there any proposal, what a formalized membership could be?   Mario to clarify

Page 63: What happened to the Perturbation Message, which was a draft book and disappeared? Mario to clarify

Page 66: Are there any priority issues coming from the work of the IOAG MOSSG final report? Mario to clarify an please highlight that the MOSSG priorities are not taken into consideration because are their opinion and not the official  IOAG output



This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.

The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its

content is not permitted.

If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.

Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.



Please consider the environment before printing this email.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20170608/78091924/attachment.html>