[CESG] [SSG] SANA suggestion

Marc Blanchet info at sanaregistry.org
Mon Jul 10 16:25:38 UTC 2017


Hello,
  Thanks for providing these comments. With the major re-architecture of 
the SANA backend and database, we have spent less time on the usability 
of the front end. We know there are improvements to be made. Right now, 
we are prioritizing the functional issues. We will work on the usability 
of the front end in the coming weeks.

Regards, Marc.

On 5 Jul 2017, at 16:00, Barkley, Erik J (3970) wrote:

> Peter,
>
> Since you asked for inputs…
>
> I'm not sure if changing the ordering on display page would be a major 
> hassle or not. I think that depends on the details of the SANA 
> implementation.  Since we are using the OID tree structure and this 
> implies some sort of organizational semantics (as opposed to a 
> “flat” GUID) then it may not be such a bad thing to have OID 
> visible on the page, but for everyday usage just to look up some 
> information perhaps this could be just some sort of filter that is 
> applied to the page by default and if you're really curious can be 
> toggled on to display the column.
>
> I agree that having the key items in the table wraparound in their 
> cells relative to the page width would be a good improvement as 
> opposed to having to scroll to infinity.
>
> -Erik
>
> From: CESG [mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of 
> Shames, Peter M (312B)
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 7:55 AM
> To: Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int; CCSDS CESG -- 
> <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>; SANA Steering Group (SSG) 
> <ssg at mailman.ccsds.org>
> Subject: Re: [CESG] SANA suggestion
>
> Ciao Gippo,
>
> I do get your point.  While the OID is the only unique "handle" that 
> we have in CCSDS it may not be of great interest to many of the users. 
>  I would agree that it could be moved to the right, but right now it 
> is uniformly displayed in that first location on all of the search 
> pages.  Changing it would be a major hassle, and I doubt it is worth 
> the effort.
>
> I would like to ask the rest of the CESG, and the SANA Steering Group 
> (SSG) if they have the same opinion?  Please speak up.
>
> On the subject of SANA and how long lies display on the screen, I have 
> another issue of my own.  Maybe we could fix it with shorter 
> definitions, but long ones tend to spill off the screen. Which I think 
> is also at the heart of Gippo's issue.  I do not know if there is a 
> simple fix, but having long lines of display text wrap to fit in the 
> screen width would seem to be a good feature.    Does anyone else 
> share that opinion?
>
> Thanks, Peter
>
> From: CESG 
> <cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>> 
> on behalf of Gian Paolo Calzolari 
> <Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>>
> Date: Monday, July 3, 2017 at 2:22 AM
> To: CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec 
> <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
> Subject: [CESG] SANA suggestion
>
> Peter,
>         I was looking on SANA for a term and I applied the filter.
> As the definitions are often long , the result is presented with an 
> horizontal scroll bar with the effect that the book where the term is 
> defined is "hidden" in the far part ofn the right of the screen.
> Conversely the OID is immediately shown.
> I can agree that OID is important but for sure is a very dedicated 
> fields for experts and as user I am much more interested in knowing 
> the book counting that definition.
> Why not swapping the position of the fields leaving to the very expert 
> user the digging of the OID value?
>
> Regards
>
> Gippo
>
> PS Two snapshot attached
>
> [cid:image001.gif at 01D2F58E.A9143280]
>
> [cid:image002.gif at 01D2F58E.A9143280]
>
> This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the 
> addressee or addressees only.
>
> The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in 
> whole or in part) of its
>
> content is not permitted.
>
> If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and 
> delete it from your system.
>
> Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the 
> sender.
>
>
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.


> _______________________________________________
> SSG mailing list
> SSG at mailman.ccsds.org
> https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ssg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20170710/185aafd8/attachment.html>


More information about the CESG mailing list