[CESG] Proposed modification to CCSDS time-code format

[Barkley, Erik J (3970)]

CESG Colleagues,

Based on the interactions/e-mails from Gippo, Mario, and Peter, attached please find a proposal for update of the timecode blue book. By way of summary, I found that the language, upon close reading, was essentially okay and that it really already allows for fractional seconds to be optional in either timecode A or timecode B and in fact abbreviations/omissions in other respects as well.  I took advantage of the examples offered by Mario as I believe these help to make to illustrate more clearly how the rules of abbreviation can be applied.   I look forward to discussing this at the CESG telecon/webex tomorrow.

Best regards,

-Erik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20160906/8b5d551f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: d1-301x0b4e1(TimeCode)-ProposedModifications-06-Sept-2016.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 27831 bytes
Desc: d1-301x0b4e1(TimeCode)-ProposedModifications-06-Sept-2016.docx
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20160906/8b5d551f/attachment.docx>