[CESG] Revised updates to CCSDS Org & Proc doc, A02.1-Y-4c1

[Scott, Keith L.]

If it’s an ESA WebEx I thought it would call you back.   Oh, you mean just plain airtime charges?  Skype (still real money but generally way cheaper)?

—keith

From: "cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>" on behalf of Richard Barton
Date: Monday, September 28, 2015 at 10:22 AM
To: Nestor Peccia
Cc: CCSDS Exec
Subject: Re: [CESG] Revised updates to CCSDS Org & Proc doc, A02.1-Y-4c1

Speaking of the next Webex, is there a way to call in via computer or VOIP or something? The last call cost me a fortune in cell phone charges.

Rick

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:12 AM, "Nestor.Peccia at esa.int<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>" <Nestor.Peccia at esa.int<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>> wrote:

Peter

I am trying to be provocative, such to ignite the CESG discussions in order to get consensus

You are focusing your proposed updates to point  4 (the "tree") and I, as CESG Chair, am trying to instigate a wide spectrum discussion covering all possibilities (the "forest")

e.g.

  1.  Can CESG Chairs be WG or SIG Chairs? They can today. As an example I can be the future SEA Architecture WG Chair. Is this acceptable to everybody ? or do we need to put some limitations in the YB ?
  2.  Can a CMC representative be CESG Chair or AD or WG or SIG Chair ? They can today. Do we need to put some limitations in the YB ?
  3.  Can an AD or DAD  be WG Chair ? They can today. Do we need to put some limitations in the YB ?
  4.  Can a CCSDS member be Chair  of several WGs ? They can today. Do we need to put some limitations in the YB ?
  5.  Can WG chair and deputy chair of a WG belong to the same Agency ? They can today. Do we need to put some limitations in the YB ?
  6.  Can an AD and DAD of a certain Area belong to the same Agency ? They can today. Do we need to put some limitations in the YB ?
  7.  Can a CCSDS member be AD / DAD in several Areas ? They can today. Do we need to put some limitations in the YB ?
  8.  Shall a WG have always a Deputy Chair ? If there is a discussion at WG level and there is consensus that a deputy is not needed, is it ok ? Do we need to say something about that in the YB?

and I am sure that I have forgotten some "trees" in my "forest"

I propose to address this discussion during our next webex on 21st October, and avoid an e-mail ping-pong. There will be no conclusion and a lot of entropy.

ciao
nestor


This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.


_______________________________________________
CESG mailing list
CESG at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:CESG at mailman.ccsds.org>
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20150928/31dec058/attachment.html>