[Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Poll with conditions

Thu Jan 16 16:16:22 EST 2014

1) I am highly pleased that my response to the 
original message (sent via the AIAA SMTP server) 
has still not cleared AIAA's queue, thus 
demonstrating the ridiculous delay of several 
minutes built in to sending anything via AIAA's 
SMTP server (I am trying to remember not to use it, but I forget).

2) When my response finally arrives, please ignore (but read for edification!).

At 03:54 PM 1/16/2014, ccsds techsupport wrote:
>Peter,
>Very do-able!!  It’s done.
>I added a new field in the back-end, so we can 
>differentiate Yellow book types.
>Thanks,
>—Laura
>
>From: <Shames>, "Peter M (312G)" 
><<mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
>Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 at 3:30 PM
>To: Brian Oliver 
><<mailto:ccsds_techsupport at aiaa.org>ccsds_techsupport at aiaa.org>, 
>Thomas Gannett 
><<mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
>Cc: 
>"<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>Nestor.Peccia at esa.int" 
><<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>, 
>"<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org" 
><<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>, 
>"Barkley, Erik J (3970)" 
><<mailto:erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
>Subject: Re: [Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Poll with conditions
>
>Hi Laura,
>
>You have that just right.  Is it do-able?
>
>Thanks, Peter
>
>
>From: CCSDS Tech Support 
><<mailto:ccsds_techsupport at aiaa.org>ccsds_techsupport at aiaa.org>
>Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 12:20 PM
>To: Tom Gannett 
><<mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
>Cc: Nestor Peccia 
><<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>, 
>CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec 
><<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>, 
>Peter Shames 
><<mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, 
>Erik Barkley <<mailto:Erik.J.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>Erik.J.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
>Subject: Re: [Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Poll with conditions
>
>Tom,
>Brian asked me to take a look into this, and I 
>must confess that I am a little confused.
>After reviewing the e-mail chain below, it 
>appears that there is several actions.  Can you confirm?
><http://public.ccsds.org/publications/YellowBooks.aspx>http://public.ccsds.org/publications/YellowBooks.aspx 
>
>1) CCSDS 313.0-Y-1  - Move this book the the 
>“Management” Section on the Yellow Book page.
>2) CCSDS B20.0-Y-2 - Move this book to the 
>“Technical” Section on the Yellow Book page.
>3) Fix the PDF icons in the “Management” section.  They appear to be missing.
>Thanks,
>—Laura
>
>From: Thomas Gannett 
><<mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
>Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 at 3:00 PM
>To: "Shames, Peter M (312G)" 
><<mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, 
>"Barkley, Erik J (3970)" 
><<mailto:erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
>Cc: 
>"<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>Nestor.Peccia at esa.int" 
><<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>, 
>Brian Oliver 
><<mailto:briano at aiaa.org>briano at aiaa.org>, 
>"<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org" 
><<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>
>Subject: Re: [Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Poll with conditions
>
>Peter:
>
>Actually, what is going on on the Web site is 
>simply a sort by document number, with a label 
>identifying the Axx books as management 
>(according to our numbering scheme).  I am sure 
>there was never any intention to organize books 
>in the list according to their content.
>
>I fully expect Brian to respond that trying to 
>make a 3xx appear at the bottom of the list with 
>the Axx books is going to screw up the sort big 
>time. If you think it's that important, we 
>should probably renumber the SANA YB to begin with A.
>
>Tom
>
>
>At 02:45 PM 12/17/2013, Shames, Peter M (312G) wrote:
>>Thanks.  That'll fix it as far as I am 
>>concerned.  And good catch on that other YB, I 
>>saw it but didn't want to go there.
>>
>>Peter
>>
>>
>>From: Tom Gannett <<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>tomg at aiaa.org>
>>Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 11:25 AM
>>To: Erik Barkley 
>><<mailto:Erik.J.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov> 
>>Erik.J.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>, Peter Shames 
>><<mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov> peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
>>Cc: Nestor Peccia 
>><<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>, 
>>Brian Oliver 
>><<mailto:briano at aiaa.org>briano at aiaa.org>, 
>>CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec 
>><<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org >
>>Subject: Re: [Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Poll with conditions
>>
>>Peter:
>>I am a long-time formality enthusiast, and I am 
>>as fond of bureaucracy as anyone, but I suspect 
>>all that was needed was for someone to advise 
>>Brian that it is a management book. It's 
>>probably my fault for not so categorizing it when I delivered it.
>>
>>Brian:
>>While we're on the subject, CCSDS B20.0-Y-2 is not a management book.
>>Tom
>>At 02:00 PM 12/17/2013, Barkley, Erik J (3970) wrote:
>>>Content-Language: en-US
>>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>> 
>>>boundary="_000_9785AD5923A1304EAB8166C9C686D15C692575C7apembxsp30RESAD_"
>>>Peter,
>>>
>>>Thank you.   It’s something of a mystery to me 
>>>as to why it was not originally “classified” 
>>>as a management book – ie put in this section 
>>>of the webpage for yellow books.  This 
>>>clarifies the issue for me and I no longer have a condition for the poll.
>>>
>>>-Erik
>>>
>>>From: Shames, Peter M (312G)
>>>Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 10:06 AM
>>>To: Barkley, Erik J (3970)
>>>Cc: Brian Oliver; 
>>><mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org; 
>>><mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
>>>Subject: Re: [CESG] Poll with conditions
>>>
>>>Erik,
>>>
>>>In regard the specific clause in the request 
>>>that the SANA Yellow Book, CCSDS 313.0-Y-1 
>>>(issued July 2011), "be re-classified as a 
>>>CCSDS Management Publication", what I was 
>>>asking was that it be given the same status as 
>>>the other Yellow Books that are treated as 
>>>CCSDS Management Publications, such as the 
>>>Organization and Processes for the 
>>>Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. 
>>>CCSDS A02.1-Y-3 , July 2011 or the CCSDS 
>>>Publications Manual. CCSDS A20.0-Y-3, December 2011.
>>>
>>>We have many Yellow Books, but many of them 
>>>are just test reports.  These are all listed 
>>>in the "Technical Yellow Books" section of the 
>>>CCSDS web site located at 
>>><http://public.ccsds.org/publications/YellowBooks.aspx>http://public.ccsds.org/publications/YellowBooks.aspx. 
>>>What I am specifically requesting is that the 
>>>SANA YB be moved into the section of this 
>>>CCSDS Yellow Book page that is titled 
>>>"Management Yellow Books".  This is where the 
>>>Org & Proc and Pubs manuals are located.  No 
>>>other changes are necessary, but this does 
>>>signal the official "management book" status of the SANA YB.
>>>
>>>Is that acceptable?
>>>
>>>Thanks, Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>From: Nestor Peccia <<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>Nestor.Peccia at esa.int >
>>>Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 9:11 AM
>>>To: CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG 
>>>Exec <<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org >
>>>Cc: Brian Oliver <<mailto:briano at aiaa.org>briano at aiaa.org>
>>>Subject: [CESG] Poll with conditions
>>>
>>>Peter
>>>Are you aware of Erik's condition to  the poll ?
>>>The website can only be updated once the condition is solved.
>>>ciao
>>>nestor
>>>=========================================
>>>CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2013-11-002
>>>Changes to the CCSDS Website Regarding SANA
>>>Results of CESG poll beginning 14 November 2013 and ending 28 November 2013:
>>>Abstain: 0 (0%)
>>>Approve Unconditionally: 5 (83%) (Peccia, Taylor, Calzolari, Shames, Scott)
>>>Approve with Conditions: 1 (17%) (Barkley)
>>>Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
>>>CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
>>>Erik Barkley (Approve Unconditionally): Please clarify what is meant by
>>>"a CCSDS Management Publication².
>>>I assume by "SANA YB", the resolution is referring to CCSDS 313.0-Y-1
>>>(issued July 2011) ? If so,
>>>is this not already a procedure manual for SANA and as such is this not
>>>already a "Management Publication" ?
>>>I agree with the intent of the poll, but I want to be clear as to what
>>>re-classification implies.
>>>Total Respondents: 6
>>>No response was received from the following Area(s):
>>>SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions
>>>PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Update website after conditions
>>>are met
>>>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>This message and any attachments are intended for the use of
>>>
>>>the
>>>
>>>
>>>addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use,
>>>
>>>
>>>dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content
>>>
>>>is
>>>
>>>
>>>not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify
>>>
>>>the
>>>
>>>
>>>sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and
>>>
>>>their
>>>
>>>
>>>integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Please consider the environment before printing this
>>>
>>>
>>>email.
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>CESG mailing list
>>><mailto:CESG at mailman.ccsds.org>CESG at mailman.ccsds.org
>>>http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Secretariat mailing list
>>><mailto:Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org
>>>http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/secretariat
>>Thomas Gannett
>>+1 443 472 0805
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20140116/1ab76b64/attachment.htm