[CESG] Re: Status of GB after CESG Poll: CESG-P-2013-03-004 Approval to publish CCSDS 901.0-G-1, Space Communications Cross Support?Architecture Description Document (Green Book, Issue 1)

[Thomas Gannett]

Nestor:

The original poll did not achieve quorum, but the 
book was nevertheless updated per Erik's 
comments. A new poll will begin tomorrow.

Regards,
Tom


At 02:04 AM 6/10/2013, Nestor.Peccia at esa.int wrote:
>Peter, Erik and Tom
>
>Please clarify the current status of the poll and the GB
>
>You will find below the poll results
>
>ciao
>nmestor
>==========================================
>
>CSS AD  Barkley Erik
>  APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS (state conditions that 
> must be satisfied) The document needs a few corrections:
>
>Figure 1-1, Graphical Conventions, and the 
>accompanying NOTES. NOTE 3 states “Organizations 
>are depicted with dashed three-dimensional 
>boxes. Organizational domains are depicted with 
>rounded, dashed, two-dimensional boxes (not shown).
>1. There should be an icon in the figure itself 
>for the  organizational domain (rounded, dashed, 
>two-dimensional box), since it is actually used in the document.
>2. The Organizational Element icon (dashed 
>three-dimensional box) is not used anywhere in 
>the document. If no use for it can be found, it 
>should  be removed from the SCCS ADD. However, 
>there may be a possible use – see the comments below on figure 2-7.
>3. If there is some reason to retain the 
>Organizational Element icon (e.g., because it 
>might be useful in derived models) then it 
>should be defined and differentiated from 
>Organizational Domain. Also, the name in the 
>NOTE (“Organization” ) should be changed to 
>match that of the icon (Organizational Element).
>
>
>Figure 2.1, Roles of the SCCS Architecture 
>Documents, uses a rounded, dashed, 
>two-dimensional box. Is this really an 
>organization domain? I suppose it may be from 
>the point of view of the architecture itself, 
>but is that the intended meaning? If so its very 
>abstract and does not really parse well -- 
>shoujld   Should the dashed line be removed? Or 
>perhaps a note needs to be added indicating that 
>this is not really an organziational domain?
>
>Figure 2-7 employs organizational domain icons 
>(rounded, dashed, two-dimensional boxes) that 
>are labeled “Service Provider (Provision 
>Management)” and  “Service User (Utilization 
>Management).”  I think that the respective 
>organizational domains are Provider Cross 
>Support System (CSSS) and User CSSS, and 
>Provision Management and Utilization 
>Management  are functions of those.  Same concerns on figure 2-8 and 2-10.
>
>Also, attached, uploaded are more detailed 
>comments from the pre-release version of the 
>document but apply to this official poll version.
>MOIMS AD  Peccia Nestor
>  APPROVE UNCONDITIONALLY  3/25/2013 11:16 AM
>
>SEA AD  Shames Peter
>  APPROVE UNCONDITIONALLY  3/19/2013 10:26 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>This message and any attachments are intended 
>for the use of the addressee or addressees only. 
>The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination 
>or copying (either in whole or in part) of its 
>content is not permitted. If you received this 
>message in error, please notify the sender and 
>delete it from your system. Emails can be 
>altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
>
>Please consider the environment before printing this email.

Thomas Gannett
+1 443 472 0805 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20130610/27f23d9f/attachment.html