[CESG] Re: RID responses for SCCS ADD GB, 901.0-G-0.1

[Shames, Peter M (313B)]

Gippo & Keith,

Thanks for your support and feedback.  The document is better for your inputs.

Erik & Takahiro,

I think it's a go to request CMC approval of the GB.  I am working on the MB now.

Cheers, Peter



From: <Scott>, Keith Scott <kscott at mitre.org<mailto:kscott at mitre.org>>
Date: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 7:41 AM
To: Erik Barkley <Erik.J.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:Erik.J.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>>, Gian Paolo Calzolari <Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>>, Peter Shames <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>>
Cc: Tom Gannett <tomg at aiaa.org<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>>, CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: RE: [CESG] Re: RID responses for SCCS ADD GB, 901.0-G-0.1

I think I worked these with Peter.

                        --keith

From: Barkley, Erik J (3970) [mailto:erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 8:58 AM
To: Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>; Shames, Peter M (313B); Scott, Keith L.
Cc: Tom Gannett; CESG -- CCSDS-Engineering Steering Group
Subject: RE: [CESG] Re: RID responses for SCCS ADD GB, 901.0-G-0.1

Gian Paolo,

Thank you very much for your email. This is exactly what is needed – a statement that your conditions for approval have been met.

Keith,

I believe that means that only your conditions are still applicable. When you have a chance, your input in this regard will be much appreciated. Thank you.

Best regards,

-Erik

From:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> [mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 6:48 AM
To: Shames, Peter M (313B)
Cc: Tom Gannett; CESG -- CCSDS-Engineering Steering Group
Subject: Re: [CESG] Re: RID responses for SCCS ADD GB, 901.0-G-0.1

Peter,
        I have no more remarks.
Your proposed changes do satisfy the conditions for approval.

Best regards

Gian Paolo
From:

"Shames, Peter M (313B)" <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>>

To:

"Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>" <Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>>, "Keith        Scott " <kscott at mitre.org<mailto:kscott at mitre.org>>

Cc:

Thomas Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net<mailto:thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>>, "\(CCSDS Engineering Steering Group\) CESG" <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>>

Date:

22/07/2013 23:23

Subject:

Re: [CESG] Re: RID responses for SCCS ADD GB, 901.0-G-0.1

Sent by:

cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>


________________________________



OK.  I think it will be clearer now that I have marked what I actually
propose to change in green.

Thanks, Peter



On 7/22/13 2:21 PM, "Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>"
<Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>> wrote:

>
>Peter, please give me a few days for the checks as I was away last week.
>Thanks
>Gian Paolo
>

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.



Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20130724/1c05cb83/attachment.htm