[CESG] Re: RID responses for SCCS ADD GB, 901.0-G-0.1

[Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int]

Peter, 
        I have no more remarks.
Your proposed changes do satisfy the conditions for approval.

Best regards

Gian Paolo



From:
"Shames, Peter M (313B)" <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
To:
"Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int" <Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>, "Keith 
Scott " <kscott at mitre.org>
Cc:
Thomas Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>, "\(CCSDS Engineering 
Steering Group\) CESG" <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Date:
22/07/2013 23:23
Subject:
Re: [CESG] Re: RID responses for SCCS ADD GB, 901.0-G-0.1
Sent by:
cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org



OK.  I think it will be clearer now that I have marked what I actually
propose to change in green.

Thanks, Peter



On 7/22/13 2:21 PM, "Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int"
<Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int> wrote:

>
>Peter, please give me a few days for the checks as I was away last week.
>Thanks
>Gian Paolo
>


This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20130724/8089ab48/attachment.htm