[Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for SSI?
Barkley, Erik J (3170)
erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov
Tue Feb 19 10:40:20 EST 2013
Nestor,
The CSS Area resolution and request for poll stand. The subject of this poll was the SSI (Solar System Internet) Architecture GB review, not the CSA (Cross Support Architecture) GB.
Best regards,
-Erik
From: cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org [mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Gannett
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 7:23 AM
To: Nestor.Peccia at esa.int; Scott, Keith L.
Cc: Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org; cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org; Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int; CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec (cesg at mailman.ccsds.org); John.j.rush at nasa.gov; Thomas Gannett; Burleigh, Scott C (313B)
Subject: Re: [Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for SSI?
Nestor:
The Area resolution I received requesting a poll for the document came from the SIS Area.
Regards,
Tom
At 10:12 AM 2/19/2013, Nestor.Peccia at esa.int<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int> wrote:
I believe we need to review the CESG poll governance
If the SIS and SLS ADs can govern a poll submitted by the CSS AD
Something is going wrong
Ciao
Nestor
Sent from my iPhone
On 19.02.2013, at 15:06, "Scott, Keith L." <kscott at mitre.org<mailto:kscott at mitre.org>> wrote:
Tom,
Thank you and my apologies for not getting to you sooner. The initial reconstituted SISG meeting was last Thursday.
Tom: I concur with your recommendation; please withdraw the CESG poll for the SSI Architecture Document. Can you please send me a copy of the document so that I can provide it to the SISG? (it seems to have already disappeared off the CESG polls page…)
Gian Paolo: You are of course correct in that the CESG review copy should be distributed to the SISG.
--keith
From: Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int> [ mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 10:00 AM
To: Thomas Gannett
Cc: CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec (cesg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>); cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>; John.j.rush at nasa.gov<mailto:John.j.rush at nasa.gov>; Scott, Keith L.; Burleigh, Scott C (313B); Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: Re: [Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for SSI?
Tom, I do concur with your proposal.
Keith, I would propose distributing to SISG the CESG approval version as this is anyhow the closest to an ec=ventual publication.
Regards
Gian Paolo
From:
Thomas Gannett <tomg at aiaa.org<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>>
To:
"Scott, Keith L." <kscott at mitre.org<mailto:kscott at mitre.org>>, " Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>" < Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>>
Cc:
" cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>" < cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>>, "Burleigh, Scott C (313B)" < scott.c.burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:scott.c.burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov>>, " Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>" < Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>>, "John.j.rush at nasa.gov<mailto:John.j.rush at nasa.gov> " <John.j.rush at nasa.gov<mailto:John.j.rush at nasa.gov>>, "CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec (cesg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org> )" <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org> >
Date:
19/02/2013 15:56
Subject:
Re: [Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for SSI?
Keith:
I was not aware that there was a "parallel" review going on; and since I had to reorganize some of the material in the book for conformance with CCSDS style, the CESG approval version differs from the version under SISG review. I think the appropriate thing to do is to withdraw the CESG poll and wait until a final version of the document is delivered to the Secretariat before starting another CESG poll. Doing so will almost certainly delay CCSDS publication until after the spring meetings, however.
Tom
At 09:28 AM 2/19/2013, Scott, Keith L. wrote:
I thought of that (or, preferable from *my* point of view, “Approve with Conditions†with the conditions being to resolve issues with the SISG). J
--keith
From: Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int> [ <mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int> mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 8:15 AM
To: Scott, Keith L.
Cc: CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec (cesg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>); cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>; John.j.rush at nasa.gov<mailto:John.j.rush at nasa.gov>; Burleigh, Scott C (313B); Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: Re: [CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for SSI?
Keith,
I do support your request and I would be in favor of canceling the current poll and restarting it after the SISG comments are finalized.
If needed we can simply DISAPPROVE WITH COMMENT this poll with the same effects :o)
Best regards
Gian Paolo
From:
"Scott, Keith L." <kscott at mitre.org<mailto:kscott at mitre.org>>
To:
" Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>" < Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Cc:
"Burleigh, Scott C \(313B\)" < scott.c.burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:scott.c.burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov>>, "John.j.rush at nasa.gov<mailto:John.j.rush at nasa.gov> " <John.j.rush at nasa.gov<mailto:John.j.rush at nasa.gov>>, "CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec \(cesg at mailman.ccsds.org\<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org/> )" <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org> >
Date:
19/02/2013 14:01
Subject:
[CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for SSI?
Sent by:
cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>
Secretariat,
The SSI Architecture Green Book is a deliverable to the IOAG and is currently being reviewed by the revived Space Internetworking Strategy Group (SISG) review team.
Can we reschedule (or maybe just extend) the polling period on the SSI Architecture Green Book until the SISG review has had a chance to comment on the document? This would allow for any comments to be incorporated as part of the CESG review process. In practice, the SISG will have reviewed the document by mid-March, so an SSI Architecture poll that ends at the end of March (i.e. delay or extend by about a month) would be useful.
--keith
Dr. Keith Scott Office: +1.703.983.6547
Principal Engineer, E535 kscott at mitre.org<mailto:kscott at mitre.org>
The MITRE Corporation<http://www.mitre.org/>
M/S H300
7515 Colshire Drive
McLean, VA 22102
Area Director, CCSDS<http://www.ccsds.org/> Space Internetworking Services<http://cwe.ccsds.org/sis/default.aspx>
MITRE self-signs its own certificates. Information about the MITRE PKI Certificate Chain is available from http://www.mitre.org/tech/mii/pki/
_______________________________________________
CESG mailing list
CESG at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:CESG at mailman.ccsds.org>
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the
addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use,
dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is
not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the
sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their
integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this
email.
_______________________________________________
Secretariat mailing list
Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/secretariat
Thomas Gannett
+1 443 472 0805
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the
addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use,
dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is
not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the
sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their
integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this
email.
_______________________________________________
CESG mailing list
CESG at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:CESG at mailman.ccsds.org>
<http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg>
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the
addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use,
dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is
not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the
sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their
integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Thomas Gannett
+1 443 472 0805
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20130219/662b7df5/attachment.htm
More information about the CESG
mailing list