[Secretariat] RE: [CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for SSI?

[Thomas Gannett]

Keith:

I was not aware that there was a "parallel" review going on; and 
since I had to reorganize some of the material in the book for 
conformance with CCSDS style, the CESG approval version differs from 
the version under SISG review.  I think the appropriate thing to do 
is to withdraw the CESG poll and wait until a final version of the 
document is delivered to the Secretariat before starting another CESG 
poll.  Doing so will almost certainly delay CCSDS publication until 
after the spring meetings, however.

Tom

At 09:28 AM 2/19/2013, Scott, Keith L. wrote:

>I thought of that (or, preferable from *my* point of view, "Approve 
>with Conditions" with the conditions being to resolve issues with 
>the SISG).   J
>
>                         --keith
>
>From: Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int [mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 8:15 AM
>To: Scott, Keith L.
>Cc: CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec 
>(cesg at mailman.ccsds.org); cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org; 
>John.j.rush at nasa.gov; Burleigh, Scott C (313B); Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org
>Subject: Re: [CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for SSI?
>
>Keith,
>         I do support your request and I would be in favor of 
> canceling the current poll and restarting it after the SISG 
> comments are finalized.
>If needed we can simply DISAPPROVE WITH COMMENT   this poll with the 
>same effects  :o)
>
>Best regards
>
>Gian Paolo
>
>From:
>"Scott, Keith L." <<mailto:kscott at mitre.org>kscott at mitre.org>
>To:
>"<mailto:Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org" 
><<mailto:Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>
>Cc:
>"Burleigh, Scott C \(313B\)" 
><<mailto:scott.c.burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov>scott.c.burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov>, 
>"<mailto:John.j.rush at nasa.gov>John.j.rush at nasa.gov" 
><<mailto:John.j.rush at nasa.gov>John.j.rush at nasa.gov>, "CCSDS 
>Engineering Steering Group - CESG 
>Exec 
>\(<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org\>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org\)" 
><<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>
>Date:
>19/02/2013 14:01
>Subject:
>[CESG] Can we belay the CESG Poll for SSI?
>Sent by:
><mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
>
>
>
>
>
>Secretariat,
>
>The SSI Architecture Green Book is a deliverable to the IOAG and is 
>currently being reviewed by the revived Space Internetworking 
>Strategy Group (SISG) review team.
>
>Can we reschedule (or maybe just extend) the polling period on the 
>SSI Architecture Green Book until the SISG review has had a chance 
>to comment on the document?  This would allow for any comments to be 
>incorporated as part of the CESG review process.  In practice, the 
>SISG will have reviewed the document by mid-March, so an SSI 
>Architecture poll that ends at the end of March (i.e. delay or 
>extend by about a month) would be useful.
>
>                         --keith
>
>
>
>Dr. Keith 
>Scott 
>Office: +1.703.983.6547
>Principal Engineer, 
>E535 
><mailto:kscott at mitre.org>kscott at mitre.org
><http://www.mitre.org/>The MITRE Corporation
>M/S H300
>7515 Colshire Drive
>McLean, VA 22102
>
>Area Director, <http://www.ccsds.org/>CCSDS 
><http://cwe.ccsds.org/sis/default.aspx>Space Internetworking Services
>
>MITRE self-signs its own certificates.  Information about the MITRE 
>PKI Certificate Chain is available from 
><http://www.mitre.org/tech/mii/pki/>http://www.mitre.org/tech/mii/pki/
>
>  _______________________________________________
>CESG mailing list
><mailto:CESG at mailman.ccsds.org>CESG at mailman.ccsds.org
>http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg
>
>
>This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the 
>addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, 
>dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content 
>is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please 
>notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be 
>altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
>
>
>Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>_______________________________________________
>Secretariat mailing list
>Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.orghttp://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/secretariat

Thomas Gannett
+1 443 472 0805 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20130219/891e3aa1/attachment.htm