[CESG] RE: Spring 2013 CCSDS Meetings

[Hooke, Adrian J (9000)]

Jean-Marc:

I have polled all of the CCSDS Areas and none of them has any problem with slipping the meeting by 1-week (Option2)

Best regards
Adrian

Adrian J. Hooke
Chairman, CCSDS Engineering Steering Group

From: Soula Jean-Marc [mailto:Jean-Marc.Soula at cnes.fr]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 9:18 AM
To: Hooke, Adrian J. (HQ-CG000)[JPL]; Nestor.Peccia at esa.int; Kearney, Mike W. (MSFC-EO01)
Cc: Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int; Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int; Moury Gilles; Nick Tongson
Subject: Spring 2013 CCSDS Meetings

Dear CMC and CESG chairmen,

following the receipt of Enrico's message below and remembering that another group had reported similar conflicts (MIA) some time ago, I have investigated again alternate options with the site in Bordeaux where we plan to organize the S-2013 meetings.
I just got a reply and it happens that they had some changes in their schedule and the required capacity now exists on the next week. However, they may have smaller meetings on same week.

Today, I have two options secured for a time:
option1 - working groups on April 08-11 // CESG on April 12 // CESG+CMC on April 15-17, 2013 (still the baseline)
option2 - working groups on April 15-18 // CESG on April 19 // CESG+CMC on April 22-24, 2013

Therefore, my question is:
if we change to option 2, will this be acceptable to all working groups or shall we create conflict situations  for groups who were satisfied with option 1 ?

I leave to you to inquire and decide.

Need to give final answer within 7 to 10 days.
Thanks for your reply before then.

Best regards

Jean-Marc Soula



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20120926/fbf31e36/attachment.html