[CESG] RE: Draft 2.0, Fall 2012 CESG report to the CMC

[Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int]

Adrian,
        If you add one clause your agency review is limited to Pink Sheet 
(singular :o)

Gippo



From:
"Hooke, Adrian J (9000)" <adrian.j.hooke at jpl.nasa.gov>
To:
"Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int" <Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>
Cc:
CESG <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Date:
14/11/2012 18:19
Subject:
RE: [CESG] RE: Draft 2.0, Fall 2012 CESG report to the CMC
Sent by:
cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org



Gippo wrote:
Ø  I was concerned too about the missing silverization label :o) 
Tom: why do the books come up without a Silver designation when you click 
on them at http://public.ccsds.org/publications/SilverBooks.aspx ??
Ø  If you really want that the standard is not made applicable applicable 
to new project, you should just edit the document adding a clause stating 
it. 
But if you edit the document, doesn?t it now require a Systematic Review 
where we send the change out to the Agencies ? and that is what Nestor was 
trying to avoid?
///a
 _______________________________________________
CESG mailing list
CESG at mailman.ccsds.org
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg



This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20121114/73fc2e74/attachment.html