[CESG] REMINDER deadline 20 July for ICPA Completion Schedule / CESG Review of current ICPA

[Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int]

Dear All,
        please remind that Comments (and questions) should be provided to 
Gian Paolo (with cc to Adrian & Nestor) by 20 July 2012.

Best regards

Gian Paolo




From:
Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
To:
cesg at mailman.ccsds.org
Date:
29/06/2012 10:01
Subject:
[CESG] ICPA Completion Schedule   / CESG Review of current ICPA
Sent by:
cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org



Dear all 

On behalf of the CESG Chair please start within your Area with the ICPA 
review. 

Please contact Gippo if questions 

Adrian and Nestor 

===================== 

Dear All, 
        a consolidated version of the IOAG-CCSDS Product Agreements (ICPA 
) is available in CWE at http://cwe.ccsds.org/fm/Lists/Projects/IOAG.aspx 
together with some practical links (e.g. IOAG Catalogs docs, etc.). This 
version includes all the standards that IOAG has requested CCSDS to 
develop within the Frame of IOAG Catalogs #1 and #2. 

Most of the first columns (i.e. Project Title, Document Number, Charter, 
Document Type, Project Status, Sched Pub) are taken directly from the CWE 
database and if anything is missing/mistaken for "chartered" projects, the 
error is in the project itself as prepared/revised by the WG. 
Projects for which the the Charter is "unapproved" reflects standards 
required by IOAG but not yet in work by any area. 

The IOAG Services column is a link to the IOAG Service(s) requiring that 
standard. 

The Two Columns IOAG Priority, IOAG Need Date show the IOAG required 
priority/date. 

The values in the columns IOAG Comments, CCSDS Comments are dummy while 
the CCSDS Response field (still dummy) is expected to contain one of the 
following 3 values: 
Agree = CCSDS agrees to meet the need date, and agrees to the requirement 
in general. 
Issue = CCSDS can not meet the need date, or in general can not meet the 
requirement that the IOAG service is asking for.  In this case, the reason 
should be explained in the comment field.   
Under Review =  CCSDS is still reviewing this request, and we?re not sure 
whether we can meet the requirement or not. 

Each Area is expected to review the ICPA rows for projects chartered to 
that area providing 
- suggested correction (if any) and 
- proposed input for the CCSDS Comments CCSDS Response fields. 

Each Area should also check the ICPA rows for unchartered projects to 
determine those relevant for their Area providing again 
- suggested correction (if any) and 
- proposed input for the CCSDS Comments CCSDS Response fields (this are 
expected to be mainly e.g. "Future Work not agreed yet" & "Under review). 

Comments (and questions) should be provided to Gian Paolo (with cc to 
Adrian & Nestor) by 20 July 2012. 
_______________________________________________
CESG mailing list
CESG at mailman.ccsds.org
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg



This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20120717/50626478/attachment.html