[CESG] ESA comments on the CESG Reprt to CMC

[Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int]

Adrian, Nestor,
        with respect to some ESA comments below see also my proposed 
comment.

 #7     Chart #28 Security WG: last bullet indicates a good example of 
collaboration between two WGs in different areas, however the precise 
result of such a cooperation is not explained clearly.
The bullet says "Good joint progress on Space Data Link Layer Security WG, 
produced by SecWG members, reported in SLS"
The cooperation is achieved through a Working Group composed mainly by 
members of the SEA Security WG but adequately integrated by participation 
and contribution by SLS Area experts with the result that a Space Data 
Link Security protocol (SDLS) has been designed by that WG and it is 
achieving full integration into the "traditional"  Space Link Protocols 
that are part of SLS Area domain.

#15     Chart #85 SLS Area Report: problems and issues reported should be 
discussed
This chart is limited to issues in the SDLS WG. I am available today 
Tuesday 11 December in the European afternoon to participate. I do not 
know whether Gilles will be able to attend too.

#16     Charts #87: clarification of the last 2 bullets; difference 
between PCOM and PLACOM? Is the recommendation to create a WG for 
producing a green book, but not yet a BB? Please clarify.
PCOM and PLACONM are the same.
YES, if the BOF will recommend a WG, the work will be limited to a Green 
Book to report about the accumulated large amount of data for planetary 
communications/navigation; i.e. to avoid wasting material and discussions 
results.

#17     Chart #88 SLS Area Report: the CMC position on Optical Coding & 
Modulation standardisation is to be discussed
Fully agreed.
Also for SLS Area AD+DAD there are points to be clarified as the OLSG has 
not provided any official input to SLS Area yet.
In this respect you can see my reply to the brief input provided by Bernie 
Edwards.

That's all 

Best regards

Gian Paolo






From:
"Hooke, Adrian J (9000)" <adrian.j.hooke at jpl.nasa.gov>
To:
CESG <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Date:
10/12/2012 22:27
Subject:
[CESG] ESA comments on the CESG Reprt to CMC
Sent by:
cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org


[attachment "Comments on CESG Report.docx" deleted by Gian Paolo 
Calzolari/esoc/ESA] 

-----Original Message-----
From: Juan.Miro at esa.int [mailto:Juan.Miro at esa.int] 
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 1:02 PM
To: Hooke, Adrian J (9000); Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
Cc: Kearney, Mike W. (MSFC-EO01)
Subject: comments on the CESG Reprt to CMC


Dear Adrain and Nestor,

following Mike's request to prepare questions to the CESG report to CMC in 
writing, find attached the list of points that in my view require 
clarification or discussion during tomorrow's meeting.

Regards
Juan

(See attached file: Comments on CESG Report.docx) This message and any 
attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. 
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in 
whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this 
message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. 
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the 
sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

_______________________________________________
CESG mailing list
CESG at mailman.ccsds.org
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg



This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20121211/dbdfac4c/attachment.html