[CESG] Extra Points for CESG meeting on 5th Nov 2011

Shames, Peter M (313B) peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov
Mon Oct 31 12:48:19 EST 2011


I'll provide a revision of the non-protocol ICS I submitted back in Berlin.  It was already in the document and then removed to focus only on the PICS for protocols.

Peter



From: Nestor Peccia <Nestor.Peccia at esa.int<mailto:Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:20:20 -0700
To: CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: Re: [CESG] Extra Points for CESG meeting on 5th Nov 2011


 *   Need we a technology patent short tutorial (maximal 30') for WG chairs in every future Boot camp
 *   ICS instead of PICS

        From CESG notes at Berlin: It was proposed that all BBs should have either a PICS (ICS) Proforma or a statement explaining why one is not included.
                                Action on Peter:  Supply example of ICS.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20111031/9c7292a0/attachment.html


More information about the CESG mailing list