[CESG] PICS text in A02.1-Y-2.1d

[Shames, Peter M (313B)]

I think we should tell DLR that this use of this approach, and this term,
is embedded in the way that CCSDS operates and that it should not be
changed here because it will have a huge ripple effect to no useful
purpose.

Or diplomatic words to that effect.

Peter


On 7/28/11 11:11 AM, "Thomas Gannett" <tomg at aiaa.org> wrote:

>Mike:
>
> From the discussion this morning is appears that we may be very near
>to being able to publish the document, but there remains one
>problematic comment from DLR that needs an explicit response from the CMC:
>
>"DLR proposes to change recommended standards into standards, because
>DLR cannot see any additional value from the word recommended and in
>the end on the ISO level  we will have a standard."
>
>I believe a CMC poll is necessary to get consensus on the proposed
>change, since at one time there was strong objection from certain
>agencies to referring to CCSDS Blue Books as actual standards.
>
>I should point out that, as a practical matter, changing the term
>would not be a simple thing, since it would involve changing a
>massive number of templates, etc., in which the term is hard
>coded.  On the other hand I personally feel that, if we can get
>everyone to agree, it would be a positive change.
>
>Tom
>
>
>
>
>
>Thomas Gannett
>+1 410 793 7190
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CESG mailing list
>CESG at mailman.ccsds.org
>http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg