[Cesg-all] Results of CESG Poll closing 14 January 2022
CCSDS Secretariat
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
Tue Jan 18 19:14:15 UTC 2022
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2021-12-002
Approval to publish CCSDS 902.2-B-1, Cross
Support Service ManagementCommunications
Planning Information Format (Blue Book, Issue 1)
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 December 2021 and ending 14 January 2022:
Abstain: 0 (0%)
Approve Unconditionally: 3 (75%) (Barkley, Duhaze, Aguilar Sanchez)
Approve with Conditions: 1 (25%) (Cola)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Tomaso de Cola (Approve with
Conditions): 1) References [3] and [6] are not
used in the specification: do we really need them?
2)Many classes point to the attributed defined in
[4] which however appears as a forthcoming CCSDS
standard, as such it is apparently not possible
to check its content and which attributes should be used in those classes.
3) Classes defined in 3.3.1.12-3.3.1.17 shall
include a number of attributes that are then
listed in following tables. There, however, all
those attributes appear as not mandatory ('N').
As such, is it really correct to say that the
class SHALL contain those attributes?
Total Respondents: 4
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SEA
SOIS
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
More information about the CESG-All
mailing list