[Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 9 June 2021

[CCSDS Secretariat]

CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2021-05-001 
Approval to publish CCSDS 230.1-G-3, TC 
Synchronization and Channel Coding—Summary of 
Concept and Rationale (Green Book, Issue 3)
Results of CESG poll beginning 26 May 2021 and ending 9 June 2021:

                 Abstain:  1 (16.67%) (Merri)
Approve Unconditionally:  5 (83.33%) (Duhaze, Burleigh, Cola, Calzolari, Moury)
Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%) Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
Total Respondents:  6

No response was received from the following Area(s):

     SEA
     CSS
     SOIS



SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Failed to achieve quorum
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Polling Period Extended

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2021-05-002 
Approval to publish CCSDS 231.0-B-4, TC 
Synchronization and Channel Coding (Blue Book, Issue 4)
Results of CESG poll beginning 26 May 2021 and ending 9 June 2021:

                 Abstain:  1 (14.29%) (Merri)
Approve Unconditionally:  6 (85.71%) (Duhaze, 
Burleigh, Cola, Calzolari, Moury, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%) Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

     Jonathan Wilmot (Approve 
Unconditionally):   Book Managed Parameters 
section lacks formal names, data types, and value 
constraints like most CCSDS standards. Since this 
issue in work at the CESG no poll condition will be imposed.


Total Respondents:  7

No response was received from the following Area(s):

     SEA
     CSS



SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2021-05-003 
Approval to publish CCSDS 130.0-G-4, Overview of 
Space Communications Protocols (Green Book, Issue 4)
Results of CESG poll beginning 26 May 2021 and ending 9 June 2021:

                 Abstain:  0 (0%) Approve 
Unconditionally:  6 (85.71%) (Duhaze, Burleigh, Cola, Calzolari, Moury, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions:  1 (14.29%) (Merri)
Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

     Mario Merri (Approve with Conditions):  1) 
Figure 2-1 on Page 2-6: The figure has a box 
labelled "MO-MAL", which is good, but MO-MAL is 
not described in any of the book text. Please add text accordingly.
2) Figure 2-1 on Page 2-6: Indeed, MO-MAL 
messages could be used as shown in the picture 
inside Space Packet Protocol or its encapsulated 
version. However, the could also be routed via 
CFDP or DTN, which does not seem allowed by the 
picture. Please discuss with the SM&C WG the best 
way to represent the location of the "MO-MAL"  box in the picture.


     Scott Burleigh (Approve 
Unconditionally):   Not a condition, but an 
editorial comment:  section 4.1 announces that 5 
examples of protocol configurations will be 
discussed, but there appear to be only 3.  Also 
section 4.3 claims to be about the fourth 
example, but it appears to be only the second.  Confusing.

     Jonathan Wilmot (Approve 
Unconditionally):   Fix spelling. LTP is listed 
as  Linklider Transmission Protocol in ANNEX A


Total Respondents:  7

No response was received from the following Area(s):

     SEA
     CSS



SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate 
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *