[Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 23 August 2021
CCSDS Secretariat
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
Tue Aug 24 19:19:41 UTC 2021
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2021-07-001
Status change to Historical for CCSDS 910.0-G-2,
Space Link Extension ServicesExecutive Summary
(Green Book, Issue 2, March 2006)
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 July 2021 and ending 23 August 2021:
Abstain: 0 (0%) Approve
Unconditionally: 7 (100%) (Barkley, Merri,
Duhaze, Shames, Cola, Sanchez, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%) Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
Total Respondents: 7
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SLS
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate CMC poll
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2021-07-002
Approval to release CCSDS 652.0-P-1.1, Audit and
Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories
(Pink Book, Issue 1.1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 July 2021 and ending 23 August 2021:
Abstain: 1 (16.67%) (Sanchez)
Approve Unconditionally: 4 (66.67%) (Merri, Duhaze, Cola, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 1 (16.67%) (Shames)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Peter Shames (Approve with
Conditions): See attached pdf with issues
flagged. There are a number of poorly worded
items and inaccuracies. The security section is weak.
Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):
CSS
SLS
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2021-07-003
Approval to release CCSDS 653.0-R-1, Information
Preparation to Enable Long Term Use (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 July 2021 and ending 23 August 2021:
Abstain: 1 (16.67%) (Sanchez)
Approve Unconditionally: 4 (66.67%) (Merri, Duhaze, Cola, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 1 (16.67%) (Shames)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Peter Shames (Approve with
Conditions): Minor issues noted where
abbreviations were used before they were
defined. See especially pg 1-2. Please fix.
Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):
CSS
SLS
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2021-07-004
Approval to release CCSDS 911.1-P-4.1, Space Link
ExtensionReturn All Frames Service Specification
(Pink Book, Issue 4.1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 July 2021 and ending 23 August 2021:
Abstain: 0 (0%) Approve
Unconditionally: 5 (83.33%) (Barkley, Merri, Shames, Cola, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%) Disapprove with Comment: 1 (16.67%) (Sanchez)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Ignacio Aguilar Sanchez (Disapprove with
Comment): Unfortunately, the draft has been
produced without the cooperation of the relevant SLS WGs.
As a consequence a number of technical
deficiencies have been identified in areas such as:
channel coding on Space-to-Earth links (1.3.2.2),
frame delimiting (2.1),
synchronization processes (2.4.1).
SLS feels that the current covid-19 constraints
may have had a negative influence in all involved
parties and in particular, through the absence of
the typical cooperation opportunities that
face-to-face spring and fall technical meetings offer.
SLS proposes that a joint effort between the
relevant CSS and SLS WGs is undertaken to produce
an agreed update of the SLE standards.
Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SLS
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Disapproved
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: No Action
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2021-07-005
Approval to release CCSDS 911.2-P-3.1, Space Link
ExtensionReturn Channel Frames Service
Specification (Pink Book, Issue 3.1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 July 2021 and ending 23 August 2021:
Abstain: 0 (0%) Approve
Unconditionally: 5 (83.33%) (Barkley, Merri, Shames, Cola, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%) Disapprove with Comment: 1 (16.67%) (Sanchez)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Ignacio Aguilar Sanchez (Disapprove with
Comment): Unfortunately, the draft has been
produced without the cooperation of the relevant SLS WGs.
In view of the identified deficiencies for the
closely related CCSDS SLE RAF, a consistency and
coherence check with such update is considered essential.
Furthermore, full consideration shall be taken of
the existence of CCSDS SDLS and SDLS EPs. For
instance Note 2 in section 3.6.2.7 did not
indicate the critical condition by which SDLS is
transparent to the RCF service: the SDLS Security
Association shall be limited to the VC which is
subject to such SLE RCF service. When this
condition is not fulfilled, there is no transparency.
SLS feels that the current covid-19 constraints
may have had a negative influence in all involved
parties and in particular, through the absence of
the typical cooperation opportunities that
face-to-face spring and fall technical meetings offer.
SLS proposes that a joint effort between the
relevant CSS and SLS WGs is undertaken to produce
an agreed update of the SLE standards.
Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SLS
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Disapproved
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: No Action
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2021-07-006
Approval to release CCSDS 911.5-P-3.1, Space Link
ExtensionReturn Operational Control Fields
Service Specification (Pink Book, Issue 3.1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 July 2021 and ending 23 August 2021:
Abstain: 0 (0%) Approve
Unconditionally: 5 (83.33%) (Barkley, Merri, Shames, Cola, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%) Disapprove with Comment: 1 (16.67%) (Sanchez)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Ignacio Aguilar Sanchez (Disapprove with
Comment): Unfortunately, the draft has been
produced without the cooperation of the relevant SLS WGs.
As a consequence, the following technical
deficiency has been identified. The new OCF
brought by the CCSDS 355.1-B-1 Space Data Link
Security Protocol Extended Procedures", which
is labelled Frame Security Report" (FSR), has not been considered.
SLS feels that the current covid-19 constraints
may have had a negative influence in all involved
parties and in particular, thorugh the absence of
the typical cooperation opportunities that
face-to-face spring and fall technical meetings offer.
SLS proposes that a joint effort between the
relevant CSS and SLS WGs is undertaken to produce
an agreed update of the SLE standards.
Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SLS
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Disapproved
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: No Action
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2021-07-007
Approval to release CCSDS 912.1-P-4.1, Space Link
ExtensionForward CLTU Service Specification
(Pink Book, Issue 4.1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 July 2021 and ending 23 August 2021:
Abstain: 0 (0%) Approve
Unconditionally: 5 (83.33%) (Barkley, Merri, Shames, Cola, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%) Disapprove with Comment: 1 (16.67%) (Sanchez)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Ignacio Aguilar Sanchez (Disapprove with
Comment): Unfortunately, the draft has been
produced without the cooperation of the relevant SLS WGs.
As a consequence, the following technical
deficiency has been identified. The new OCF
brought by the CCSDS 355.1-B-1 Space Data Link
Security Protocol Extended Procedures", which
is labelled Frame Security Report" (FSR), has not been considered.
SLS feels that the current covid-19 constraints
may have had a negative influence in all involved
parties and in particular, through the absence of
the typical cooperation opportunities that
face-to-face spring and fall technical meetings offer.
SLS proposes that a joint effort between the
relevant CSS and SLS WGs is undertaken to produce
an agreed update of the SLE standards.
Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SLS
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Disapproved
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: No Action
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2021-07-008
Approval to release CCSDS 912.3-P-3.1, Space Link
ExtensionForward Space Packet Service
Specification (Pink Book, Issue 3.1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 July 2021 and ending 23 August 2021:
Abstain: 0 (0%) Approve
Unconditionally: 5 (83.33%) (Barkley, Merri, Shames, Cola, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%) Disapprove with Comment: 1 (16.67%) (Sanchez)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Ignacio Aguilar Sanchez (Disapprove with
Comment): Unfortunately, the current draft has
been produced without the cooperation of the relevant SLS WGs.
The previous draft had considered to a very
limited extent the existence of the CCSDS SDLS
(see 2.4.1.2, b)). Such scenario assumed that an
FSP user would not want to disclose to a third
party the information related to the SDLS
configuration. It followed that the FSP user
would be the owner of those parameters. This is
questionable because it would be up to the FSP
provider to develop the frame, including its SDLS parameters.
The FSP user could simply request that its packet
be protected on the space link with a set of
security services and the FSP provider could
supply those services without the need for the
FSP user to know the configuration details. The
SLE FSP service would need to protect its
transactions in coherence with the security
services requested by the FSP user for the space
link security. After all, CCSDS cross-support is
based on the implicit trust between cooperating
parties to execute the agreed commitments for the provision of the SLE service.
As already mentioned for the SLE CLTU and SLE
ROCF services, the existence of the FSR and its
potential purpose in connection with SLE FSP
would need to be considered as well.
Given the general recommendation to update all
SLE drafts in a joint CSS/SLS cooperation, it is
proposed to revisit the scenarios concerning SDLS and SDLS EPs.
In connection to this joint effort, it shall be
noted that the CCSDS 350.5-G-1 (SDLS GB) had
excluded the SLE FSP service (see 2.3.4.3). This
section might need to be revisited.
Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SLS
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Disapproved
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: No Action
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
More information about the CESG-All
mailing list