[Cesg-all] Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 12 July 2019

CCSDS Secretariat thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
Mon Jul 15 17:39:06 UTC 2019


Dear CESG members:

As noticed by Erik, the wrong RID report was attached to the poll 
cited below. The correct report is attached to this message.




>Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:08:08 -0400
>To: Erik.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov
>From: CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
>Subject: Fwd: Results of CESG Polls closing 12 July 2019
>Cc: jon.hamkins at jpl.nasa.gov, bernard.l.edwards at nasa.gov
>
>Erik:
>
>First, mea maxima culpa, I attached the wrong RID report to the 
>poll. (There were two versions with long names differentiated only 
>by a date at the end, which did not show up in directory view.) The 
>correct version is attached to this email.
>
>Second, the statement in the draft test report is not inconsistent 
>with our procedures, and in fact the Foreword of the draft Blue Book 
>contains the statement (required by our procedures):
>
>"Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of 
>this document may be the subject of patent rights. CCSDS has 
>processes for identifying patent issues and for securing from the 
>patent holder agreement that all licensing policies are reasonable 
>and non-discriminatory.  However, CCSDS does not have a patent law 
>staff, and CCSDS shall not be held responsible for identifying any 
>or all such patent rights."
>
>Please respond to this email if you feel your conditions have been 
>satisfied (or not).
>
>Best regards,
>Tom
>
>
>>CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2019-06-001 Approval to publish 
>>CCSDS 141.0-B-1, Optical Communications Physical Layer (Blue Book, Issue 1)
>>Results of CESG poll beginning 30 June 2019 and ending 12 July 2019:
>>
>>                 Abstain:  1 (16.67%) (Merri)
>>Approve Unconditionally:  4 (66.67%) (Shames, Burleigh, Calzolari, Wilmot)
>>Approve with Conditions:  1 (16.67%) (Barkley)
>>Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
>>CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
>>
>>     Erik Barkley (Approve with Conditions):  1)  There are no 
>> dispositions indicated in the RID report.  Please include the 
>> dispositions of the RIDs in the RID report.
>>
>>2) Patent considerations:
>>
>>a) The recommendations states: No patents are known to relate to 
>>this Recommended Standard.
>>
>>b) The test report states: JPL has not filed any patents specific 
>>to the proposed 141.0-R-1 standard [1]. Implementers are cautioned 
>>that there are many patents on the general topic of physical layer 
>>optical communications.
>>a) and b) above seem to be at odds -- Please update the 
>>recommendation and/or test report as appropriate.
>>
>>
>>Total Respondents:  6
>>
>>All Areas responded to this question.
>>
>>
>>
>>SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
>>PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after 
>>conditions have been addressed
>>
>>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: RID Disposition for HPE Physical Layer Red Book_20180410.docx
Type: application/msword
Size: 206704 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg-all/attachments/20190715/5cb022bf/attachment-0001.doc>


More information about the CESG-All mailing list