[Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 6 December 2018

[CCSDS Secretariat]

CESG E-Poll Identifier:  
Results of CESG poll beginning 21 November 2018 and ending 6 December 2018:

                 Abstain:  1 (20%) (Calzolari)
 Approve Unconditionally:  4 (80%) (Barkley, Merri, Burleigh, Wilmot)
 Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%) 
 Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%) 

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

     Erik Barkley (Approve Unconditionally):  Comment only: a complete code listing (API "header" file) would be useful and/or some indication of the same in SANA. 


Total Respondents:  5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

     SEA

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  
Results of CESG poll beginning 21 November 2018 and ending 6 December 2018:

                 Abstain:  1 (20%) (Merri)
 Approve Unconditionally:  4 (80%) (Barkley, Burleigh, Calzolari, Wilmot)
 Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%) 
 Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%) 

Total Respondents:  5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

     SEA

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  
Results of CESG poll beginning 21 November 2018 and ending 6 December 2018:

                 Abstain:  1 (20%) (Merri)
 Approve Unconditionally:  4 (80%) (Barkley, Burleigh, Calzolari, Wilmot)
 Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%) 
 Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%) 

Total Respondents:  5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

     SEA

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  
Results of CESG poll beginning 21 November 2018 and ending 6 December 2018:

                 Abstain:  1 (20%) (Calzolari)
 Approve Unconditionally:  3 (60%) (Merri, Burleigh, Wilmot)
 Approve with Conditions:  1 (20%) (Barkley)
 Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%) 

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

     Erik Barkley (Approve with Conditions):  Editorial suggestion: Section 1.1:  FROM "...Specifically, the Servicie Access Point (SAP) primitives..."  TO  "...Specifically, the Service Access Point (SAP) primitives..."  

Condition:

The "*" annotation on Page A-1 for Mandatory Features is unclear. It states that "*at least one of these primitives to be implemented" It seems to me that PACKET_SEND.request and PACKET_RECEIVE.indication have to marked with the check mark -- I fail to see how just implementing one of these is all that is needed for mandatory features.  Please double check and updated/and or provide clarifying information.

Suggestion (not a condition):

I believe current practice is not to require SANA registires section for agency review; nontheless it must be present before final publication and therefore I suggest that this be added piror to agency review.


Total Respondents:  5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

     SEA

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  
Results of CESG poll beginning 21 November 2018 and ending 6 December 2018:

                 Abstain:  1 (20%) (Calzolari)
 Approve Unconditionally:  3 (60%) (Merri, Burleigh, Wilmot)
 Approve with Conditions:  1 (20%) (Barkley)
 Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%) 

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

     Erik Barkley (Approve with Conditions):  A condition:
Re Test Report: can the test report be made more clear to discuss the failed test cases -- it is difficult to search the document for "failed" (many hits for DELIVERY_FAILED)  and I did not get a good sense of discusion as to resolution re the failed test cases -- it appears that some of the failures are expected but again, I can not get a good sense of whether or not testing was complete.  

A suggestion (not a condition):

Re RID Report:  There are minor irregularites in that all of the RID resolutions do not appear to record the final conclusion in all cases (last column in the spreadsheet is balnk for serveral RID rows), but this tends to be inferred from the proposed response and actions columns.  For clarity and completeness it is suggested to have all RIDS conclusions fully documented, especially with respect to the "Agreement of author wrt. Proposed action" column.


Total Respondents:  5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

     SEA

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *