[Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 6 December 2018

Thomas Gannett thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
Fri Dec 7 23:52:45 UTC 2018


CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2018-11-001 
Approval to publish CCSDS 523.2-M-1, Mission 
Operations Message Abstraction Layer—C++ API (Magenta Book, Issue 1)
Results of CESG poll beginning 21 November 2018 and ending 6 December 2018:

                  Abstain:  1 (20%) (Calzolari)
  Approve Unconditionally:  4 (80%) (Barkley, Merri, Burleigh, Wilmot)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

Erik Barkley (Approve Unconditionally): Comment 
only: a complete code listing (API "header" file) 
would be useful and/or some indication of the same in SANA.


Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

SEA

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2018-11-002 
Approval to publish CCSDS 141.11-O-1, Optical 
High Data Rate (HDR) Communication—1064 NM (Orange Book, Issue 1)
Results of CESG poll beginning 21 November 2018 and ending 6 December 2018:

                  Abstain:  1 (20%) (Merri)
  Approve Unconditionally:  4 (80%) (Barkley, Burleigh, Calzolari, Wilmot)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

SEA

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2018-11-003 
Approval to release CCSDS 431.1-R-1, Variable 
Coded Modulation Protocol (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 21 November 2018 and ending 6 December 2018:

                  Abstain:  1 (20%) (Merri)
  Approve Unconditionally:  4 (80%) (Barkley, Burleigh, Calzolari, Wilmot)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

SEA

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2018-11-004 
Approval to release CCSDS 851.0-P-1.1, Spacecraft 
Onboard Interface Services—Subnetwork Packet 
Service (Pink Book, Issue 1.1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 21 November 2018 and ending 6 December 2018:

                  Abstain:  1 (20%) (Calzolari)
  Approve Unconditionally:  3 (60%) (Merri, Burleigh, Wilmot)
  Approve with Conditions:  1 (20%) (Barkley)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

Erik Barkley (Approve with Conditions): Editorial 
suggestion: Section 1.1: FROM "...Specifically, 
the Servicie Access Point (SAP) primitives..." TO 
"...Specifically, the Service Access Point (SAP) primitives..."

Condition:

The "*" annotation on Page A-1 for Mandatory 
Features is unclear. It states that "*at least 
one of these primitives to be implemented" It 
seems to me that PACKET_SEND.request and 
PACKET_RECEIVE.indication have to marked with the 
check mark -- I fail to see how just implementing 
one of these is all that is needed for mandatory 
features. Please double check and updated/and or 
provide clarifying information.

Suggestion (not a condition):

I believe current practice is not to require SANA 
registires section for agency review; nontheless 
it must be present before final publication and 
therefore I suggest that this be added piror to agency review.


Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

SEA

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate 
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2018-11-005 
Approval to publish CCSDS 524.4-B-1, Mission 
Operations—Message Abstraction Layer Binding to 
ZMTP Transport (Blue Book, Issue 1)
Results of CESG poll beginning 21 November 2018 and ending 6 December 2018:

                  Abstain:  1 (20%) (Calzolari)
  Approve Unconditionally:  3 (60%) (Merri, Burleigh, Wilmot)
  Approve with Conditions:  1 (20%) (Barkley)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

Erik Barkley (Approve with Conditions): A condition:
Re Test Report: can the test report be made more 
clear to discuss the failed test cases -- it is 
difficult to search the document for "failed" 
(many hits for DELIVERY_FAILED) and I did not get 
a good sense of discusion as to resolution re the 
failed test cases -- it appears that some of the 
failures are expected but again, I can not get a 
good sense of whether or not testing was complete.

A suggestion (not a condition):

Re RID Report: There are minor irregularites in 
that all of the RID resolutions do not appear to 
record the final conclusion in all cases (last 
column in the spreadsheet is balnk for serveral 
RID rows), but this tends to be inferred from the 
proposed response and actions columns. For 
clarity and completeness it is suggested to have 
all RIDS conclusions fully documented, especially 
with respect to the "Agreement of author wrt. Proposed action" column.


Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

SEA

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate 
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Thomas Gannett
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
+1 443 472 0805 



More information about the CESG-All mailing list