[Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 6 December 2018
Thomas Gannett
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
Fri Dec 7 23:52:45 UTC 2018
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2018-11-001
Approval to publish CCSDS 523.2-M-1, Mission
Operations Message Abstraction LayerC++ API (Magenta Book, Issue 1)
Results of CESG poll beginning 21 November 2018 and ending 6 December 2018:
Abstain: 1 (20%) (Calzolari)
Approve Unconditionally: 4 (80%) (Barkley, Merri, Burleigh, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Erik Barkley (Approve Unconditionally): Comment
only: a complete code listing (API "header" file)
would be useful and/or some indication of the same in SANA.
Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SEA
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate CMC poll
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2018-11-002
Approval to publish CCSDS 141.11-O-1, Optical
High Data Rate (HDR) Communication1064 NM (Orange Book, Issue 1)
Results of CESG poll beginning 21 November 2018 and ending 6 December 2018:
Abstain: 1 (20%) (Merri)
Approve Unconditionally: 4 (80%) (Barkley, Burleigh, Calzolari, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SEA
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate CMC poll
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2018-11-003
Approval to release CCSDS 431.1-R-1, Variable
Coded Modulation Protocol (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 21 November 2018 and ending 6 December 2018:
Abstain: 1 (20%) (Merri)
Approve Unconditionally: 4 (80%) (Barkley, Burleigh, Calzolari, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SEA
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate CMC poll
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2018-11-004
Approval to release CCSDS 851.0-P-1.1, Spacecraft
Onboard Interface ServicesSubnetwork Packet
Service (Pink Book, Issue 1.1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 21 November 2018 and ending 6 December 2018:
Abstain: 1 (20%) (Calzolari)
Approve Unconditionally: 3 (60%) (Merri, Burleigh, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 1 (20%) (Barkley)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Erik Barkley (Approve with Conditions): Editorial
suggestion: Section 1.1: FROM "...Specifically,
the Servicie Access Point (SAP) primitives..." TO
"...Specifically, the Service Access Point (SAP) primitives..."
Condition:
The "*" annotation on Page A-1 for Mandatory
Features is unclear. It states that "*at least
one of these primitives to be implemented" It
seems to me that PACKET_SEND.request and
PACKET_RECEIVE.indication have to marked with the
check mark -- I fail to see how just implementing
one of these is all that is needed for mandatory
features. Please double check and updated/and or
provide clarifying information.
Suggestion (not a condition):
I believe current practice is not to require SANA
registires section for agency review; nontheless
it must be present before final publication and
therefore I suggest that this be added piror to agency review.
Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SEA
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2018-11-005
Approval to publish CCSDS 524.4-B-1, Mission
OperationsMessage Abstraction Layer Binding to
ZMTP Transport (Blue Book, Issue 1)
Results of CESG poll beginning 21 November 2018 and ending 6 December 2018:
Abstain: 1 (20%) (Calzolari)
Approve Unconditionally: 3 (60%) (Merri, Burleigh, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 1 (20%) (Barkley)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Erik Barkley (Approve with Conditions): A condition:
Re Test Report: can the test report be made more
clear to discuss the failed test cases -- it is
difficult to search the document for "failed"
(many hits for DELIVERY_FAILED) and I did not get
a good sense of discusion as to resolution re the
failed test cases -- it appears that some of the
failures are expected but again, I can not get a
good sense of whether or not testing was complete.
A suggestion (not a condition):
Re RID Report: There are minor irregularites in
that all of the RID resolutions do not appear to
record the final conclusion in all cases (last
column in the spreadsheet is balnk for serveral
RID rows), but this tends to be inferred from the
proposed response and actions columns. For
clarity and completeness it is suggested to have
all RIDS conclusions fully documented, especially
with respect to the "Agreement of author wrt. Proposed action" column.
Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SEA
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Thomas Gannett
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
+1 443 472 0805
More information about the CESG-All
mailing list