[Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 14 September 2017
CCSDS Secretariat
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
Fri Sep 15 21:49:04 UTC 2017
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2017-08-005
Approval to publish CCSDS 401.0-B-27, Radio
Frequency and Modulation SystemsPart 1: Earth
Stations and Spacecraft (Blue Book, Issue 27)
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 August 2017 and ending 14 September 2017:
Abstain: 2 (33.33%) (Merri, Behal)
Approve Unconditionally: 4 (66.67%) (Barkley, Burleigh, Calzolari, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SEA
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate CMC poll
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2017-08-006
Approval to publish CCSDS 522.1-B-1, Mission
Operations Monitor & Control Services (Blue Book, Issue 1)
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 August 2017 and ending 14 September 2017:
Abstain: 1 (16.67%) (Calzolari)
Approve Unconditionally: 5 (83.33%) (Barkley,
Merri, Behal, Burleigh, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Erik Barkley (Approve Unconditionally): Following
is commentary only. This is not a condition.
The test report is impressive in its thoroughness
and, from a strictly technical point of view,
appears to be quite complete. But it is done
strictly in the abstract. From the test report,
just to quote a somewhat random sampling, there
are statements along the lines of:
. Forces preCheck to return false, then checks that preCheck returns false
. that attempting to change an argument's raw unit value is successful
While it is noted that it is very good to have
all of the logic checks called out, this logic is
strictly in the abstract, and therefore no
demonstration of this logic against real world
mission operation scenarios. As there is no such
demonstartion there is then a lack of
check/assurance that the logic is in fact not
"empty". I suspect it is not. Mapping the
abstract service via prototype testing to some
real world mission operation scenarios would, I
think, hlep the working group to make the
recommendation more compelling and thereby help
to foster adoption for real world missions.
To further illustrate this, consider a mission
launch scenario, or an orbit insertion, or entry
descent and landing. In addition, consider some
sort of on-board fault detection. I believe
multiple of our member agencies have had to deal
with these kind of scenarios and exercise
spacecraft recovery as a result of on-board fault
detection etc. It would be interesting to see the
services of the recommendation applied against
such real-world scenarios and demonstrated as to
how they (the scenarios) could be accommodated in a standardized fashion.
Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SEA
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate CMC poll
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2017-08-007
Approval to publish CCSDS 524.2-B-1, Mission
OperationsMessage Abstraction Layer Binding to
TCP/IP Transport and Split Binary Encoding (Blue Book, Issue 1)
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 August 2017 and ending 14 September 2017:
Abstain: 1 (16.67%) (Calzolari)
Approve Unconditionally: 4 (66.67%) (Barkley, Merri, Behal, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 1 (16.67%) (Burleigh)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Erik Barkley (Approve Unconditionally): A comment, not a condition.
Some of the RID dispostions read both accepted
and rejected. It appears that this is a log of
the disposition status. In the future, it is
recommended to only record the final disposition
for the RID report presented for polling purposes.
Scott Burleigh (Approve with Conditions): It was
not clear to me which MAL operations map to
initiation and acceptance of TCP connections
using "socket" terminology. I think most TCP
developers are more familiar with the socket API
than with the TCP protocol specification, so I
think adding some notes on this mapping might improve implementation success.
Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SEA
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2017-08-009
Approval to publish CCSDS 766.2-B-1, Voice and
Audio Communications (Blue Book, Issue 1)
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 August 2017 and ending 14 September 2017:
Abstain: 0 (0%)
Approve Unconditionally: 5 (83.33%) (Barkley,
Merri, Behal, Burleigh, Calzolari)
Approve with Conditions: 1 (16.67%) (Wilmot)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Jonathan Wilmot (Approve with Conditions):
Satifactory answers to a short list of questions.
The questions will be sent to the SIS/Voice
Working Group chair by CoB 9/15/2017
Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SEA
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2017-08-010
Approval to publish CCSDS 881.1-B-1, Spacecraft
Onboard Interface ServicesRFID Tag Encoding Specification (Blue Book, Issue 1)
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 August 2017 and ending 14 September 2017:
Abstain: 3 (50%) (Merri, Behal, Calzolari)
Approve Unconditionally: 3 (50%) (Barkley, Burleigh, Wilmot)
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):
SEA
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate CMC poll
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
More information about the CESG-All
mailing list