[Cesg-all] Results of CMC Polls Closing 6 May 2016

[CCSDS Secretariat]

CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2016-04-010 
Authorization to publish CCSDS 313.0-Y-2, Space 
Assigned Numbers Authority (SANA)—Role, 
Responsibilities, Policies, and Procedures Yellow Book, Issue 2)

Results of CMC poll beginning 13 April 2016 and ending 6 May 2016:

                 Adopt:  9 (90%) (CNSA, CSA, DLR, 
ESA, FSA, INPE, JAXA, NASA, UKSA)
   Adopt Provisionally:  1 (10%) (CNES)
                Reject:  0 (0%)
  Reject with Comments:  0 (0%)

CNES: - Is Reference [2] in section 1.7 
appropriate as it is never called in the document ?
- Section 2 (bottom of page 2-1), puts 
prerequisites on the agency review, with a 
candidate registry, and to the publication, with 
an approved registry. Three questions:
* as this is new, should it be documented in the 
the CCSDS Org & Processes document ?
* as this may delay the overall production cycle 
of standards, are there commitments from the SANA 
operator on the maximum time required to 
establish a Candidate / Approved registry ?
* Could approval of the registry be part of the 
same poll as the prublication of the related 
standard (to avoid consecutive polls) ?
If so, processes should also be updated.
- In section 3.18 what is meant with the words 
"concurrence of the CMC" for "formation (b)" or 
"termination (h) of an expert group? As CMC 
manages the allocation of resources should the 
word "concurrence" be replaced with the word "approval" ?


Results are based on responses from 10 out of 11 members (90.91%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ASI

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted Provisionally
Resulting CMC Resolution:               CMC-R-2016-05-001
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Address Provisions; Publish Document

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2016-04-011 
Authorization to publish CCSDS 313.1-Y-1, CCSDS 
SANA Registry Management Policy (Yellow Book, Issue 1)

Results of CMC poll beginning 13 April 2016 and ending 6 May 2016:

                 Adopt:  9 (90%) (CNSA, CSA, DLR, 
ESA, FSA, INPE, JAXA, NASA, UKSA)
   Adopt Provisionally:  1 (10%) (CNES)
                Reject:  0 (0%)
  Reject with Comments:  0 (0%)

CNES: Questions to be clarified:
- §1.2 and §1.3.1 What is actually binding onto 
the Agencies in providing or not enterprise or 
service provider information ? The use of "shall" 
in this document is found abusive in many places 
as the demanded information is not strictly 
related to a CCSDS need (e.g.: organization or 
protocol). The Agencies should be free to expose 
whatever they feel usefull or to keep in 
confidence information not strictly CCSDS related 
("should" better suits this case).
- §3.3.1.3.13 Why is a service provider or user 
role identified here while this definition 
overlaps with the roles of P-O Members or Associates?
- § 3.3.2.1 Is it anticipated that GSCIds will 
never more be assigned to Simulators or the like 
? If so, is it mentioned somewhere in the document (not found)?
- Annex B §B1 The term "sponsors" is not clear 
and the FigB1 may be confusing as Observers are 
not sponsored by the Members ... or some text should be added.
- Annex B Table B3. "Transmit frequency" to be 
replaced by "Frequency band" and modify type, 
range and notes accordingly... and clarify how 
the case of a satellite having several 
frequencies, several GSCId, etc... will be handled.
- Annex B (B4 and B5): there are duplicates 
between "site and aperture registries" and "IOAG 
RF COMMUNICATION assets": how will this be 
controlled if there are different PoC ?


Results are based on responses from 10 out of 11 members (90.91%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ASI

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted Provisionally
Resulting CMC Resolution:               CMC-R-2016-05-002
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Address Provisions; Publish Document

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2016-04-012 
Authorization to publish CCSDS 313.2-Y-1, 
Procedures for SANA Registry Specification (Yellow Book, Issue 1)

Results of CMC poll beginning 13 April 2016 and ending 6 May 2016:

                 Adopt:  9 (90%) (CNSA, CSA, DLR, 
ESA, FSA, INPE, JAXA, NASA, UKSA)
   Adopt Provisionally:  1 (10%) (CNES)
                Reject:  0 (0%)
  Reject with Comments:  0 (0%)

CNES: In section 2.3, clarify if a prototype 
registry in e) is same as a Candidate registry in 
i). Candidate and Approved are available on the 
SANA site while prototype is unclear.


Results are based on responses from 10 out of 11 members (90.91%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ASI

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted Provisionally
Resulting CMC Resolution:               CMC-R-2016-05-003
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Address Provisions; Publish Document

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *