[Cesg-all] Fwd: RE: Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to release CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services-RFID Tag Encoding Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review

Fri May 29 16:06:23 UTC 2015

>Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 11:46:19 -0400
>To: cesg at mailman.ccsds.org
>From: Thomas Gannett <tomg at aiaa.org>
>Subject: Fwd: RE: Results of CESG Poll 
>CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to release CCSDS 
>881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface 
>Services-RFID Tag  Encoding Specification (Red 
>Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>
>ADs and DADs:
>
>Conditions for approval to release CCSDS 
>881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface 
>Services--RFID Tag Encoding Specification (Red 
>Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review have been 
>satisfied. The Secretariat will proceed with CMC polling.
>
>>From: "Barkley, Erik J (3970)" <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
>>To: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at Colorado.EDU>, "Shames, Peter M (312B)"
>>         <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Scott, Keith L." <kscott at mitre.org>
>>CC: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)" <patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>, "Barton,
>>  Richard J. (JSC-EV811)" <richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>, Thomas Gannett
>>         <tomg at aiaa.org>, Yuriy Sheynin <sheynin at aanet.ru>
>>Subject: RE: Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to release
>>   CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services-RFID Tag  Encoding
>>  Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>>Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 17:37:16 +0000
>>
>>Kevin,
>>
>>Apologies for the delay in responding. Thank 
>>you for the updates.  My conditions stated in the poll have been satisfied.
>>
>>I will note that I recognize the SANA registry 
>>considerations as essentially coming from 
>>Peters work in updating the overall SANA 
>>registration policy.  And I think a) it is good 
>>and proper to have this in a document about to 
>>go out for agency review and b) It will be 
>>interesting to hear what various agencies have 
>>to say about this policy and I would encourage 
>>various reviewers to really review this section 
>>as this represents a new policy in CCSDS re 
>>SANA considerations (vs the current laissez-faire policy).
>>
>>I look forward to an interesting review.
>>
>>Best regards,
>>
>>-Erik
>>
>
>>From: "Scott, Keith L." <kscott at mitre.org>
>>To: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at Colorado.EDU>, "Shames, Peter M (312B)"
>>         <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Barkley, Erik J (3970)"
>>         <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
>>CC: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)" <patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>, "Barton,
>>  Richard J. (JSC-EV811)" <richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>, Thomas Gannett
>>         <tomg at aiaa.org>, Yuriy Sheynin <sheynin at aanet.ru>
>>Subject: RE: Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to release
>>   CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services-RFID Tag  Encoding
>>  Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>>Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 23:56:23 +0000
>>
>>Looks better to me; my conditions are satisfied.
>>
>>                         --keith
>>
>>From: "Shames, Peter M (312B)" <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
>>To: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.gifford at Colorado.EDU>, "Barkley, Erik J (3970)"
>>         <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Scott, Keith L." <kscott at mitre.org>
>>CC: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)" <patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>, "Barton,
>>  Richard J. (JSC-EV811)" <richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>, Thomas Gannett
>>         <tomg at aiaa.org>, Yuriy Sheynin <sheynin at aanet.ru>
>>Subject: Re: Results of CESG Poll CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to release
>>   CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services-RFID Tag  Encoding
>>  Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>>Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 00:30:35 +0000
>>    From: <Shames>, "Peter M (312B)" 
>> <<mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
>>Date: Monday, May 18, 2015 4:00 PM
>>To: Kevin Gifford 
>><<mailto:Kevin.Gifford at colorado.edu>Kevin.Gifford at colorado.edu>, 
>>"Barkley, Erik J (3970)" 
>><<mailto:erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>, 
>>"Scott, Keith L." <<mailto:kscott at mitre.org>kscott at mitre.org>
>>Cc: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)" 
>><<mailto:patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>, 
>>"Barton, Richard J. (JSC-EV811)" 
>><<mailto:richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>, 
>>Thomas Gannett 
>><<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>tomg at aiaa.org>, Yuriy 
>>Sheynin <<mailto:sheynin at aanet.ru>sheynin at aanet.ru>
>>Subject: Re: Results of CESG Poll 
>>CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to release CCSDS 
>>881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface 
>>Services-RFID Tag Encoding Specification (Red 
>>Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>>Hi Kevin,
>>I concur with the RID resolutions that you have 
>>applied to this document.  It is acceptable to 
>>me for this document to be released for review.
>>Best regards, Peter
>
>>
>>
>>From: Kevin K Gifford 
>><<mailto:kevin.gifford at Colorado.EDU>kevin.gifford at Colorado.EDU>
>>Date: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 10:15 AM
>>To: Peter Shames 
>><<mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, 
>>Erik Barkley 
>><<mailto:Erik.J.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>Erik.J.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>, 
>>Keith Scott <<mailto:kscott at mitre.org>kscott at mitre.org>
>>Cc: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)" 
>><<mailto:patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>, 
>>Richard Barton 
>><<mailto:richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>, 
>>Tom Gannett 
>><<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>tomg at aiaa.org>, Yuriy 
>>Sheynin <<mailto:sheynin at aanet.ru>sheynin at aanet.ru>
>>Subject: Re: Results of CESG Poll 
>>CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to release CCSDS 
>>881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface 
>>Services-RFID Tag Encoding Specification (Red 
>>Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>>
>>Dear Peter, Erik, Keith 
>>
>>Thank you for your time and expertise in 
>>providing the review of the SOIS Wireless WG RFID Tag-Encoding Red Book.
>>
>>Attached please find two documents detailing 
>>the WWG's responses and associated 
>>updates.  The WWG concurred with all of the 
>>specific comments.  The attached spreadsheet 
>>lists the reviewer's (your) critique and lists 
>>the WWG action to address the RID along with 
>>indicating the specific document pages updated 
>>in the second attachment which is a clean 
>>version of the document with all identified Review Items dispositioned.
>>
>>Please let me know if the changes meet with 
>>your approval or if you have any remaining 
>>outstanding issues that need to be addressed.
>>
>>Thanks again for your time in reviewing the 
>>SOIS Wireless WG RFID Tag-Encoding Red Book.
>>
>>Kevin
>>
>>From: Thomas Gannett <<mailto:tomg at aiaa.org>tomg at aiaa.org>
>>Date: Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:31 AM
>>To: Kevin Gifford 
>><<mailto:gifford at rintintin.colorado.edu>gifford at rintintin.colorado.edu>
>>Cc: "Fink, Patrick W. (JSC-EV811)" 
>><<mailto:patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>patrick.w.fink at nasa.gov>, 
>>"Barton, Richard J. (JSC-EV811)" 
>><<mailto:richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>richard.j.barton at nasa.gov>, 
>>"<mailto:Jean-Francois.Dufour at esa.int>Jean-Francois.Dufour at esa.int" 
>><<mailto:Jean-Francois.Dufour at esa.int>Jean-Francois.Dufour at esa.int>, 
>>"<mailto:peter.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>peter.shames at jpl.nasa.gov" 
>><<mailto:peter.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>peter.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, 
>>"<mailto:Erik.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>Erik.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov" 
>><<mailto:Erik.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>Erik.Barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
>>Subject: Results of CESG Poll 
>>CESG-P-2015-03-006 Approval to release CCSDS 
>>881.1-R-1, Spacecraft Onboard Interface 
>>Services-RFID Tag Encoding Specification (Red 
>>Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>>
>>Dear Kevin et al.:
>>The CESG poll to approve release of the SOIS 
>>RFID Tag Red Book concluded with conditions. 
>>The conditions are stated below--I have 
>>attached the SEA AD's mark-up (881x1r0_CESG_Approval-SEA.pdf).
>>
>>I have also attached the Word file 
>>(881x1r0_CESG_Approval.doc) used to create the 
>>PDF file used in the poll. Please use it to 
>>make changes in response to conditions.
>>Resolution of the conditions should be 
>>negotiated directly with the authors of the 
>>conditions (CCed) and reported back to the CESG.
>>Best regards,
>>Tom
>>
>>
>>
>>CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2015-03-006 
>>Approval to release CCSDS 881.1-R-1, Spacecraft 
>>Onboard Interface Services-RFID Tag Encoding 
>>Specification (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
>>Results of CESG poll beginning 29 March 2015 and ending 15 April 2015:
>>                  Abstain:  3 (37.5%) (Merri, Behal, Calzolari)
>>  Approve Unconditionally:  3 (37.5%) (Suess, Barton, Scott)
>>  Approve with Conditions:  2 (25%) (Shames, Barkley)
>>  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
>>CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
>>Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions): This 
>>document still needs some work, particularly in 
>>the areas relating to the use of SANA and the guidance to the SANA operator.
>>The data structure is also probably more 
>>awkward than it needs to be, but that appears to be a legacy limitation.
>>please see the attached mark-up.
>>Erik Barkley (Approve with Conditions): 
>>Condition 1: For this type of recommendation an 
>>ICS should be stated to help ensure a good 
>>agency review -- it will be useful to know what 
>>is mandatory and what is optional in the ID 
>>(probably all of it but there is no direct statement of that)
>>Condition 2: it will be very helpful for agency 
>>reviews to know what the policy is for 
>>assigning database IDs in SANA -- note that 
>>claiming the SANA Registry as the administrator 
>>is insufficient as current CCSDS practice is 
>>that the recommendation that defines a registry 
>>must, necessarily, identify its management policy.
>>Keith Scott (Approve Unconditionally): I'm 
>>willing to let this go through to Agency 
>>Review, but the 'To Be Supplied' sections in 
>>the document (PICS, Patent Considerations) are 
>>questionable. I think the CESG should discuss 
>>whether such (admittedly slightly) incomplete 
>>documents should be put out for Agency Review.
>>
>>Total Respondents: 8
>>No response was received from the following Area(s):
>>SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
>>PROPOSED SECRETARIAT 
>>ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after conditions have been addressed
>>
>>Thomas Gannett
>>+1 443 472 0805
>Thomas Gannett
>+1 443 472 0805

Thomas Gannett
+1 443 472 0805 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg-all/attachments/20150529/27077ca7/attachment.html>