[Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2015

[Nestor.Peccia at esa.int]

Poll has to be issued by Brian
Not Tom
Copy Brian

Sent from my iPhone

> On 20.05.2015, at 17:53, Mario.Merri at esa.int wrote:
> 
> Dear Tom, 
> 
> herewith I confirm that the issues raised by Peter have been resolved. Please issue the CMC poll. 
> 
> Best regards, 
> 
> __Mario 
> 
> 
> 
> From:        ccsds techsupport <ccsds_techsupport at aiaa.org> 
> To:        "cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org" <cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org>, 
> Date:        29/04/2015 04:10 
> Subject:        [Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 23 April 2015 
> Sent by:        cesg-all-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org 
> 
> 
> 
> CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2015-04-001 Creation the MOIMS Mission Planning and Scheduling WG 
> 
> Results of CESG poll beginning 09 April 2015 and ending 23 April 2015: 
> 
> Abstain:  0 (0%) 
> Approve Unconditionally:  7 (87.5%) (Barkley, Merri, Behal, de Cola, Calzolari, Suess, Barton) 
> Approve with Conditions:  1 (12.5%) (Shames) 
> Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%) 
> 
> CONDITIONS/COMMENTS: 
> Barkley - A comment: the goals section of the charter ends mid-sentence as presented for the poll.  My assumption is that the goals, to be consistent with the stated scoping of "...The submission of Planning Requests (input to Mission Planning) • The distribution of Plans/Schedules (output of Mission Planning)..." will include blue books specifications for these two items. 
> 
> Shames - I have two concerns about this WG, as stated in the charter and white paper: 
> 1) The focus in most of these materials seems to be on SM&C and how it can solve the problem, rather than on Mission Planning and a clear presentation of what they need.  This is both "cart before the horse" and looks like an overly tight binding that may be detrimental to the overall usability of the resulting standards. 
> 2) The WG leadership is exclusively Euro-centric.  Since there does appear to be a significant North American interest in this it would be sensible to broaden the coverage to recognize that. 
> 
> Total Respondents: 8 
> 
> No response was received from the following Area(s): 
> 
> SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions 
> PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:  Once Conditions are met start CMC Poll 
> _______________________________________________
> CESG-all mailing list
> CESG-all at mailman.ccsds.org
> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all
> 
> This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
> The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
> content is not permitted.
> If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
> Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
> 
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> _______________________________________________
> CESG-all mailing list
> CESG-all at mailman.ccsds.org
> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg-all/attachments/20150520/8350cc81/attachment.html>