[Cesg-all] RE: Why is SLS-SLP the Review Authority for the SCPS-TP Extended Capability Binding Space Identifiers?

[Scott, Keith L.]

Seems to be the same for all the SCPS registries.  Maybe because SLS-SLP is an extant WG?

                        --keith

From: Scott, Keith L.
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 4:20 PM
To: Secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org; CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG All (cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org); greg.j.kazz at jpl.nasa.gov
Subject: Why is SLS-SLP the Review Authority for the SCPS-TP Extended Capability Binding Space Identifiers?

Shouldn't the review authority for http://sanaregistry.org/r/scps_tp_extended_capability_id/scps_tp_extended_capability_id.html

Be the SIS area, not SLS-SLP?

                        --keith

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg-all/attachments/20150330/4abed418/attachment.html>