[Cesg-all] Wiki forum Approach

[Weiss, Howard]

Nestor

I'm late in this discussion since I was on holiday last week and the beginning of this week.

Unless the wiki is truly interactive, I'm not sure what information would/should be populated there vs. the kind of material that we traditionally put into a Green Book as rationale and guidance for a Blue Book. If we are contemplating a FAQ and questions & answers as part of the Wiki, then this seems like a good idea.  But as others have already said, if it's a restatement of material already in various other documents, then I'm not convinced of its value.

Regards

howie

From: cesg-all-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org [mailto:cesg-all-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 2:10 AM
To: cesg at mailman.ccsds.org
Cc: cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org; cmc at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: [Cesg-all] Wiki forum Approach

Dear ADs/DADs

It is probably my mistake due to the way how I have formulated the request, but what was supposed to be an inquiry to the WGs Chairs / Co-Chairs, has resulted in a CESG discussion (and this was assumed as the 2nd step)

I recognize that some ADs are also WG Chairs (which is the exception and not the rule), but I have received fast responses from 4 ADs and only 1 WG Chair.

@ WG Chairs / Co-Chairs : Please let us have your feedback.

ciao
nestor

I

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.

The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its

content is not permitted.

If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.

Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.



Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg-all/attachments/20150305/36598d2d/attachment.html>