[Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 2 May 2014

[Thomas Gannett]

CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2014-04-001 
Approval to release CCSDS 914.0-P-1.1, Space Link 
Extension—Application Program Interface for 
Transfer Services—Core Specification (Pink 
Sheets, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 18 April 2014 and ending 2 May 2014:

                  Abstain:  1 (20%) (Scott)
  Approve Unconditionally:  3 (60%) (Shames, Peccia, Barkley)
  Approve with Conditions:  1 (20%) (Calzolari)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

Gian Paolo Calzolari (Approve with Conditions): 
As backward compatibility implications for 
Generation 1 are stated, include also implications for Generation2.

Section E4.2 states that "The Application Program 
Interface specified in this Recommended Practice 
shall not be assumed to be backward compatible 
with specifications in earlier versions of the 
Recommended Practice.". Therefore the statements 
marked G1 or G2 (and not applicable to G3) cannot 
be inside mandatory clauses (with shall) but moved outside to be optional.


Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

SOIS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate 
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2014-04-002 
Approval to release CCSDS 915.1-P-1.1, Space Link 
Extension—Application Program Interface for 
Return All Frames Service (Pink Sheets, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 18 April 2014 and ending 2 May 2014:

                  Abstain:  1 (20%) (Scott)
  Approve Unconditionally:  2 (40%) (Peccia, Barkley)
  Approve with Conditions:  2 (40%) (Shames, Calzolari)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions): Pg 1-8 
lists a Pink Sheet doc as a normative reference. 
This should be fixed to reference the final doc once it is approved.

Gian Paolo Calzolari (Approve with Conditions): 
As backward compatibility implications for 
Generation 1 are stated, include also implications for Generation2.
 From the changes I can see in these pink sheets 
it looks to me that the markings [Gn:] / [Gn,m:] 
are never used in this document. Is this correct? 
If yes, why stating about those markers? Would it 
be simpler to omit that part or state that the 
convention is set but not needed yet till this version?
Please clarify.


Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

SOIS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate 
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2014-04-003 
Approval to release CCSDS 915.2-P-1.1, Space Link 
Extension—Application Program Interface for 
Return Channel Frames Service (Pink Sheets, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 18 April 2014 and ending 2 May 2014:

                  Abstain:  1 (20%) (Scott)
  Approve Unconditionally:  2 (40%) (Peccia, Barkley)
  Approve with Conditions:  2 (40%) (Shames, Calzolari)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions): Fix the reference error on pg 1-2.

Gian Paolo Calzolari (Approve with Conditions): 
As backward compatibility implications for 
Generation 1 are stated, include also implications for Generation2.


Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

SOIS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate 
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2014-04-004 
Approval to release CCSDS 915.5-P-1.1, Space Link 
Extension—Application Program Interface for 
Return Operational Control Fields Service (Pink 
Sheets, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 18 April 2014 and ending 2 May 2014:

                  Abstain:  1 (20%) (Scott)
  Approve Unconditionally:  3 (60%) (Shames, Peccia, Barkley)
  Approve with Conditions:  1 (20%) (Calzolari)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

Gian Paolo Calzolari (Approve with Conditions): 
Include a note to explain why Generation 1 is not valid for this book.


Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

SOIS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate 
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2014-04-005 
Approval to release CCSDS 916.1-P-1.1, Space Link 
Extension—Application Program Interface for the 
Forward CLTU Service (Pink Sheets, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 18 April 2014 and ending 2 May 2014:

                  Abstain:  1 (20%) (Scott)
  Approve Unconditionally:  4 (80%) (Shames, Peccia, Barkley, Calzolari)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

SOIS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate 
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2014-04-006 
Approval to release CCSDS 916.3-P-1.1, Space Link 
Extension—Application Program Interface for the 
Forward Space Packet Service (Pink Sheets, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 18 April 2014 and ending 2 May 2014:

                  Abstain:  1 (20%) (Scott)
  Approve Unconditionally:  3 (60%) (Shames, Peccia, Barkley)
  Approve with Conditions:  1 (20%) (Calzolari)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

Gian Paolo Calzolari (Approve with Conditions): 
Include a note to explain why Generation 1 is not valid for this book.


Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

SOIS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate 
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *