[Cesg-all] Result of Recent CMC Polls

[CCSDS Secretariat]

CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-P-2013-09-007 
Authorization to publish CCSDS 320.0-B-6, Global 
Spacecraft Identifier Field: Code Assignment Control Procedures

Results of CMC poll beginning 23 September 2013 and ending 7 October 2013:

                 ADOPT:  8 (80%) (CNES, CNSA, CSA, ESA, FSA, INPE, JAXA, NASA)
   ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  2 (20%) (DLR, UKSA)
                REJECT:  0 (0%)
  REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

      DLR:  delete the e.V. in DLR so that DLR is 
only mentioned as Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raufahrt.
Is that Book going as an ISO standard or kept within CCSDS?
      UKSA:  I highly recommend that we try to 
get annex A on to a single page. Even if that is 
not practical, we should change the layout so 
that the first page does not end with TO:

That just looks silly.


Results are based on responses from 10 out of 11 members (90.91%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ASI

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted Provisionally
Resulting CMC Resolution:               CMC-R-2013-10-001
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Publish Document

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-P-2013-09-008 
Approval of New Project for SLS - 5.01 RF and Modulation Working Group	

Results of CMC poll beginning 24 September 2013 and ending 8 October 2013:

                 ADOPT:  9 (90%) (CNES, CNSA, 
CSA, ESA, FSA, INPE, JAXA, NASA, UKSA)
   ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  1 (10%) (DLR)
                REJECT:  0 (0%)
  REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

      DLR:  1. at least for standards we had the 
rule, that two member agencies have to show 
interesst. Here only CNES is writing the book and monitoring it.
2. From the old BOF activities of planetary 
communication, I had in mind a far quicker 
development of the green book. Now the publishing date is two years from now.
3. If the book is looking especially for future 
mission, then it should take into account the 
IOAG discussions in narrowing the proposed coding and modulation types.
      ESA:  ESA will participate as monitoring Agency


Results are based on responses from 10 out of 11 members (90.91%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ASI

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted Provisionally
Resulting CMC Resolution:               CMC-R-2013-10-002 (pending provisions)
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Address 
Provisions; Update Organizational Records

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-P-2013-09-010 
Authorization to release CCSDS 524.1-R-1, Mission 
Operations Message Abstraction Layer—Space Packet 
Binding (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review

Results of CMC poll beginning 25 September 2013 and ending 9 October 2013:

                 ADOPT:  10 (100%) (CNES, CNSA, 
CSA, DLR, ESA, FSA, INPE, JAXA, NASA, UKSA)
   ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  0 (0%)
                REJECT:  0 (0%)
  REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

Results are based on responses from 10 out of 11 members (90.91%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ASI

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution:               CMC-R-2013-10-003
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Release Review Document

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-P-2013-10-001 
Authorization to approve the Swiss Space Office 
of Switzerland as a CCSDS Observer Agency

Results of CMC poll beginning 3 October 2013 and ending 17 October 2013:

                 ADOPT:  9 (90%) (CNSA, CSA, DLR, 
ESA, FSA, INPE, JAXA, NASA, UKSA)
   ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  1 (10%) (CNES)
                REJECT:  0 (0%)
  REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

      CNES:  This is not a condition and CNES 
approves the new observer. Nevertheless, it would 
be interesting to have some information on the 
motivation of the SSO to join the CCSDS, their 
specific interest in the domain of Space Data 
Systems and if they plan to be active in the WGs. 
In addition, the relationship of the SSO with the 
"Swiss Association for Standardization (SNV)", 
the standard body in ISO (while not in TC20) 
could be clarified for future reference.


Results are based on responses from 10 out of 11 members (90.91%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ASI

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution:               CMC-R-2013-10-004
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Update Organizational Records

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *