[Cesg-all] Results of recent CESG polls

[CCSDS Secretariat]

CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2012-07-001 Approval to publish CCSDS 
702.1-B-1,  IP over CCSDS Space Links (Blue Book, Issue 1)
Results of CESG poll beginning 31 July 2012 and ending 22 August 2012:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  6 (85.71%) (Shames, Peccia, Barkley, 
Taylor, Moury, Scott)
  Approve with Conditions:  1 (14.29%) (Calzolari)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

      Gian Paolo Calzolari (Approve with Conditions):  The document 
gives the impression that it is possible to transfer data of 
unlimited size and this is wrong.
There is only a statement affirming "The Unitdata parameter is the 
SDU transferred by the IPoC service; it shall contain a delimited, 
octet-aligned IP PDU."
However we know that at least a limit is given by the Encapsulation 
packet; i.e. the maximum length of a data unit that can be 
accommodated in an encapsulating packet is 4,294,967,287 octets when 
the Encapsulation Packet is used (see CCSDS 133.1-B-2).
The factors affecting the maximum size of the Unitdata parameter 
shall be declared (together with applicable warning as e.g. NOTE 1 of 
4.2.2.8 from CCSDS 133.1-B-2 or the fact that project specific values 
of max length may be selected).
Actually the best solution - consistent with other books - could be 
to add a Managed Parameter Section including a parameter for Unitdata max size.


Total Respondents:  7

All Areas responded to this question.

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after 
conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2012-08-001 Approval of CCSDS 
132.0-B-1 Cor. 1, Technical Corrigendum 1 to CCSDS 132.0-B-1, Issued 
September 2003
Results of CESG poll beginning 8 August 2012 and ending 22 August 2012:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  6 (100%) (Shames, Peccia, Barkley, 
Taylor, Calzolari, Scott)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

Total Respondents:  6

All Areas responded to this question.

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2012-08-002 Approval of CCSDS 
133.0-B-1 Cor. 2, Technical Corrigendum 2 to CCSDS 133.0-B-1, Issued 
September 2003
Results of CESG poll beginning 8 August 2012 and ending 22 August 2012:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  5 (100%) (Shames, Peccia, Barkley, 
Calzolari, Scott)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

Total Respondents:  5

No response was received from the following Area(s):

      SOIS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2012-08-003 Approval of CCSDS 
133.1-B-2 Cor. 1, Technical Corrigendum 1 to CCSDS 133.1-B-2, Issued 
October 2009
Results of CESG poll beginning 8 August 2012 and ending 22 August 2012:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  5 (100%) (Shames, Peccia, Barkley, 
Calzolari, Scott)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

Total Respondents:  5

No response was received from the following Area(s):

      SOIS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2012-08-004 Approval of CCSDS 
232.0-B-2 Cor. 1, Technical Corrigendum 1 to CCSDS 232.0-B-2, Issued 
September 2010
Results of CESG poll beginning 8 August 2012 and ending 22 August 2012:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  4 (100%) (Shames, Peccia, Barkley, Calzolari)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

Total Respondents:  4

No response was received from the following Area(s):

      SOIS
      SIS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2012-08-005 Approval of CCSDS 
732.0-B-2 Cor. 1, Technical Corrigendum 1 to CCSDS 732.0-B-2, Issued July 2006
Results of CESG poll beginning 8 August 2012 and ending 22 August 2012:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  5 (100%) (Shames, Peccia, Barkley, 
Calzolari, Scott)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

Total Respondents:  5

No response was received from the following Area(s):

      SOIS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2012-08-006 Status change to 
Historical for CCSDS 135.0-B-4, Space Link Identifiers (Blue Book, 
Issue 4, October 2009)
Results of CESG poll beginning 8 August 2012 and ending 22 August 2012:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  5 (83.33%) (Shames, Peccia, Barkley, Moury, Scott)
  Approve with Conditions:  1 (16.67%) (Calzolari)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

      Gian Paolo Calzolari (Approve with Conditions):  Silverization 
of CCSDS 135.0-B-4 can be done only after approving publication for 
CCSDS 702.1-B-0, IP over CCSDS Space Links (that is not finalized yet).

Total Respondents:  6

No response was received from the following Area(s):

      SOIS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after 
conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *