[Cesg-all] Result of recently closed CESG Polls

[CCSDS Secretariat]

CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2011-02-004 Approval to release CCSDS 
351.0-R-0.1, Security Architecture for Space Data Systems (Proposed 
Red Book) for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 11 February 2011 and ending 25 February 2011:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  6 (100%) (Shames, Peccia, Taylor, 
Calzolari, Moury, Durst)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

Total Respondents:  6

No response was received from the following Area(s):

      CSS



SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2011-02-005 Approval to release CCSDS 
506.1-R-1,  Delta-DOR Raw Data Exchange Format (Red Book, Issue 1) 
for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 23 February 2011 and ending 8 March 2011:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  6 (100%) (Shames, Peccia, Barkley, 
Taylor, Calzolari, Durst)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

      Erik Barkley (Approve Unconditionally):  To be clear: this is 
not a condition of approval -- the book is very good shape, ready for 
agency reviews.  These are more of considerations for CESG:

The file content definitions include agency indications with 1 = ESA 
2 = JAXA, 3 = NASA (appears to be alphabetic ordering).   Presumably 
this implies that should another agency implement and participate in 
inter-agency DDOR, CCSDS will issue an appropriate pink 
sheet.  Alternatively perhaps this is information that belongs in 
SANA?  If so, then I would suggest that agency identifications become 
part of the candidate CCSDS OID (Object Identifiers) rather than 
defined specifically for this recommendation.  This also applies to 
other controlled identifiers such as Spacecraft Id found in this 
recommendation.

      Bob Durst (Approve Unconditionally):  Just want to note that I 
agree with Erik's point about a SANA role.


Total Respondents:  6

All Areas responded to this question.



SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2011-02-006 Approval to publish CCSDS 
506.0-M-1,  Delta-Differential One Way Ranging (Delta-DOR) Operations 
(Magenta Book, Issue 1)
Results of CESG poll beginning 25 February 2011 and ending 11 March 2011:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  6 (100%) (Shames, Peccia, Barkley, 
Taylor, Calzolari, Durst)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

Total Respondents:  6

All Areas responded to this question.



SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *