[Cesg-all] Result of CESG polls closing 15 April 2011

[CCSDS Secretariat]

CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2011-03-003 Approval to dissolve 
Information Packaging and Registries Working Group
Results of CESG poll beginning 30 March 2011 and ending 15 April 2011:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  8 (100%) (Shames, Peccia, Thompson, 
Barkley, Taylor, Calzolari, Moury, Durst)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

Total Respondents:  8

All Areas responded to this question.



SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2011-03-004 Approval to dissolve 
Information Architecture Working Group
Results of CESG poll beginning 30 March 2011 and ending 15 April 2011:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  8 (100%) (Shames, Peccia, Thompson, 
Barkley, Taylor, Calzolari, Moury, Durst)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

      Erik Barkley (Approve Unconditionally):  Comments only (does 
not affect the vote): The IAWG was intended to address one thread of 
an overall CCSDS deficiency that was recognized at the SuperBOF 
meeting held at ESTEC in October 2009.  This was the so-called "SOA 
for Space" activity.  I would like to suggest that CESG bear in mind 
that lack of resources/interest should not to be confused with 
solving the issues/ need for detailed standards re services that will 
eventually support such visionary activities as the confederated data 
systems needed to manage Space Internetworking.    So, although it is 
clear this WG is not moving forward, I believe that CESG would do 
well to maintain cognizance over appropriate standards being 
developed by industry at large.


Total Respondents:  8

All Areas responded to this question.



SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier:  CESG-P-2011-03-005 Approval to release CCSDS 
355.0-R-1,  Space Data Link Security Protocol  (Red Book, Issue 1) 
for CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 30 March 2011 and ending 15 April 2011:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  7 (87.5%) (Peccia, Thompson, Barkley, 
Taylor, Calzolari, Moury, Durst)
  Approve with Conditions:  1 (12.5%) (Shames)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

      Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions):  The document is in 
very good shape, but there are some minor issues and a question:

1) Why is Porx-1 not addressed along with TM, TC & AOS?  Is there the 
assumption that if data is securely delivered to space that relaying 
it is then not a problem?

2) There is no PICS Pro Forma.  This could be left for the next rev 
of the doc, but one is needed.

3) Section 2.2 seems to overstate the "features of the protocol".  It 
does not preserve sequence, it just signals it.

4) Minor other edits marked in text.

      Bob Durst (Approve Unconditionally):  Per section 1.7.1
"b) the word 'should' implies an optional, but desirable, specification;"

I believe that the "should" in 4.1.2.2 needs to be a "shall."
"4.1.2.2 If authentication is not selected for an SA, this field 
should be zero octets in length"

But I'm not really here, and this isn't a condition for approval...


Total Respondents:  8

All Areas responded to this question.



SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 355x0r0_CESG_Aproval-ps.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 1206317 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg-all/attachments/20110418/af0dc9f9/355x0r0_CESG_Aproval-ps-0001.pdf