[Cesg-all] PRP A9-20 Request for CESG Review

[Thomas Gannett]

Jean-Luc:

The CWE does not dictate how we do business, but it should accurately 
reflect real procedures.  Please supply the link(s) to the erroneous 
information and I will have it fixed.

Thanks,
Tom


At 10:55 AM 11/23/2009, Jean-Luc.Gerner at esa.int wrote:
>Tom,
>I am not talking of the Procedures Manual, which you claim dates back the
>times of papers, but of what is currently on the CWE and reuqested from WG
>chairs and Area Directors.
>
>I suggest we apply the rules currently in force and discuss at the next
>meeting whether these rules should be amended.
>
>best regards
>Jean-Luc Gerner
>TEC-ETN
>Tel: +31 71 565 4473
>
>
>
>              Thomas Gannett
>              <tomg at aiaa.org>
>                                                                           To
>              23/11/2009 16:42           "Jean-Luc.Gerner at esa.int"
>                                         <Jean-Luc.Gerner at esa.int>, Tom
>                                         Gannett <TomG at aiaa.org>
>                                                                           cc
>                                         "CESG-all at mailman.ccsds.org"
>                                         <CESG-all at mailman.ccsds.org>,
>                                         "cesg-all-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org"
>                                         <cesg-all-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>
>                                                                      Subject
>                                         Re: [Cesg-all] PRP A9-20 Request for
>                                         CESG Review
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Jean-Luc:
>
>The three-month review period is something we observed when we were
>doing hard-copy distribution.  Since electronic distribution started
>we have observed a two month-review period (same review period less
>the four weeks it used to take to ship books from Maryland to
>Europe).  Therefore the review period for TM Synchronization and
>Channel Coding is actually slightly longer than normal to allow for
>the holidays.
>
>The Procedures Manual has obviously not been updated for many years,
>but the next version will reflect current practices.
>
>Since you indicate you actually have no reason to change from the
>timeline, there is no reason to consider changing the due date.
>
>Best regards,
>Tom
>
>At 09:07 AM 11/23/2009, Jean-Luc.Gerner at esa.int wrote:
> >The CMC suggested timeline foresees that the initial formal agency review
> >will be open for 3 months. It also indicates that if one plans to deviate
> >from the suggested timeline, one should indicate the reason for the change.
> >
> >Actually, I have no reason for a change from the timeline, except that given
> >that XMAS holidays are in between, I propose to extend the timeline by two
> >weeks.
> >
> >Given the time of issuance of the review request, 17 November, please move
> >the due date to 1st March 2010.
> >
> >Thank you.
> >
> >
> >Jean-Luc Gerner
> >TEC-ETN
> >Tel: +31 71 565 4473
> >
> >
> >
> >              CCSDS Rapporteur
> >              <tomg at aiaa.org>
> >              Sent by:
>To
> >              cesg-all-bounces at m         <CESG-all at mailman.ccsds.org>
> >              ailman.ccsds.org
>cc
> >
> >
>Subject
> >              17/11/2009 00:02           [Cesg-all] PRP A9-20 Request for
> >                                         CESG Review
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Control Number: PRP A9-20
> >
> >The following draft CCSDS Recommended Standard has been placed on
> >line for CCSDS Agency review:
> >
> >       CCSDS 131.0-P-1.1.  TM Synchronization and Channel Coding.
> >                           Pink Book.  November 2009.
> >
> >DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION:  The Recommended Standard for TM
> >Synchronization and Channel Coding contains specifications to be used
> >by space missions on synchronous communications links.  The current
> >draft update adds new sections on Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC)
> >codes and security, updates other coding sections for uniformity of
> >presentation, and corrects and updates erroneous and obsolete material.
> >
> >The due date for receipt of review comments by the Review Coordinator
> >is 2010-2-1.  Area Directors and WG/BOF Chairs may submit review
> >comments directly to the CCSDS Review Coordinator.  More information
> >is available at the Web site identified below.
> >
> >The review document, in Portable Document Format (PDF), and
> >associated review materials are available for downloading at the
> >following location:
> >
> >       http://public.ccsds.org/review/
> >
> >NOTES
> >
> >1  Per CMC Action Item CMC-A-2007-10-05, agency reviewers are reminded to
> >     review for compliance with the CCSDS Publications Manual as well as
> >     technical content.
> >
> >2  Per CESG Resolution CESG-R-2008-10-006, the CESG no longer conducts
> >     pre-Agency-review reviews but is instead expected to participate in
> >     Agency reviews when they are announced.
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >CESG-all mailing list
> >CESG-all at mailman.ccsds.org
> >http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all
>
>Thomas Gannett
>+1 443 472 0805

Thomas Gannett
+1 443 472 0805