[Cesg-all] CMC Poll Results
Neil Dissinger
neild at aiaa.org
Fri Sep 1 13:11:27 EDT 2006
CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2006-07-004: Authorization to
terminate Time Critical Onboard Network Services (TCONS)
Working Group
Results of CMC poll beginning 26 July 2006 and ending 25
August 2006:
ADOPT: 6 (85.71%) (ASI, CNES, DLR, INPE,
JAXA, NASA)
ADOPT PROVISIONALLY: 1 (14.29%) (BNSC)
REJECT: 0 (0%)
REJECT WITH COMMENTS: 0 (0%)
BNSC: I believe that the resolution, as worded, does
not accurately reflect the situation that exists and I
propose a revised wording of the resolution.
The CMC,
CONSIDERING that the Space On-board Interface
Services(SOIS) Area Director has determined that there is
no currently identified need for immediate development of
transport and network layers for spacecraft onboard
interface services,
and NOTING that off-the-self (IP and CCSDS) transport and
network protocols are available if transport and network
layers capabilities are required,
and ACKNOWLEDGING that the SOIS Area Director has
requested to terminate the Working Group,
and NOTING that the resources, extensive work and
documentation (three draft books) of TCONS will be
redirected to the Sub-Network Services and Onboard
Applications Working Groups,
AUTHORIZES the termination of the Time Critical Onboard
Network Services (TCONS) Working Group.
Results are based on responses from 7 out of 10 members
(70%).
No response was received from the following Agencies:
CSA
ESA
FSA
Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted
Provisionally
Resulting CMC Resolution: TBD
Inferred Secretariat Action: Contingent on Disposition of
Provisions
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2006-07-005: Authorization to
Update to the Onboard Bus LAN (OBL) Working Group Charter
Results of CMC poll beginning 26 July 2006 and ending 25
August 2006:
ADOPT: 5 (71.43%) (ASI, CNES, INPE, JAXA,
NASA)
ADOPT PROVISIONALLY: 2 (28.57%) (BNSC,
DLR)
REJECT: 0 (0%)
REJECT WITH COMMENTS: 0 (0%)
BNSC: Is it permissible for the Blue Book to be
published while the prototyping work is still going on?
The schedule implies this will be the case.
DLR: It is not realistic to have a red book out in
November and the review processed finished with an blue
book in the next March. Please revise the planning dates.
Results are based on responses from 7 out of 10 members
(70%).
No response was received from the following Agencies:
CSA
ESA
FSA
Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted
Provisionally
Resulting CMC Resolution: TBD
Inferred Secretariat Action: Contingent on Disposition of
Provisions
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2006-07-006: Authorization to
Update to the Time Critical Onboard Application Services
(TCOAS) Working Group Charter
Results of CMC poll beginning 26 July 2006 and ending 25
August 2006:
ADOPT: 5 (71.43%) (ASI, CNES, INPE, JAXA,
NASA)
ADOPT PROVISIONALLY: 2 (28.57%) (BNSC,
DLR)
REJECT: 0 (0%)
REJECT WITH COMMENTS: 0 (0%)
BNSC: A similar point to Martin's. Why are there
several Red Books, culminating in one Blue Book? This may
be the most efficient way to proceed, but it should be
made clear what the connection between the red and blue
books will be.
DLR: Is the TCOAS blue book including the previous
issued red books?
there are different Red Books scheduled to be published
for June 2006. Are these books out for review?
Results are based on responses from 7 out of 10 members
(70%).
No response was received from the following Agencies:
CSA
ESA
FSA
Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted
Provisionally
Resulting CMC Resolution: TBD
Inferred Secretariat Action: Contingent on Disposition of
Provisions
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2006-08-001: Authorization to
release CCSDS 131.1-O-1, Low Density Parity Check Codes
for Use in Near-Earth and Deep Space Applications (Orange
Book, Issue 1)
Results of CMC poll beginning 16 August 2006 and ending 30
August 2006:
ADOPT: 6 (100%) (ASI, BNSC, DLR, INPE,
JAXA, NASA)
ADOPT PROVISIONALLY: 0 (0%)
REJECT: 0 (0%)
REJECT WITH COMMENTS: 0 (0%)
Results are based on responses from 6 out of 10 members
(60%).
No response was received from the following Agencies:
CNES
CSA
ESA
FSA
Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution: CMC-R-2006-08-001
Inferred Secretariat Action: Publish Document
More information about the CESG-all
mailing list