[Cesg-all] CMC Poll Results

[Neil Dissinger]

CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-P-2006-06-006, Authorization 
to approve the liaison between TC20/SC13 CCSDS Navigation 
WG and the TC20/SC14 WG 3 Operations and Ground Support

Results of CMC poll beginning 29 June 2006 and ending 14 
July 2006:

                 ADOPT:  5 (62.5%) (ASI, BNSC, CSA, INPE, 
JAXA)
   ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  3 (37.5%) (CNES, DLR, NASA)
                REJECT:  0 (0%)
  REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

      CNES:  Clarifications required :
- could the CMC be made aware of the details of Dr Berry's 
previous involvement in the Navigation WG ?
- is there any potential impact on the charter of the 
Navigation WG ?
- the proposed procedure only plans for a coordination and 
collaboration limited to comments and suggestions ; is 
there any option to go further and make sure of no 
duplication or have joint activities (production) in some 
cases ?
      DLR:  Liaison is stated in WG charter
      NASA:  I approve the liaison but I do not understand 
the resource implications for NASA. The attachment states 
that a NASA person has been assigned to the liaison ("Dr. 
David Berry designated by Felipe Flores-Amaya and Nestor 
Peccia ") but it does not indicate whether such an 
appointment falls within existing resources or is an 
"additional duty" for Dr. Berry


Results are based on responses from 8 out of 10 members 
(80%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

ESA
FSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted 
Provisionally
Resulting CMC Resolution:               TBD
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Forward results

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-P-2006-06-008: Authorization 
to publish Corrigendum 1 to Image Data Compression 
Recommended Standard (CCSDS 122.0-B-1)

Results of CMC poll beginning 29 June 2006 and ending 14 
July 2006:

                 ADOPT:  9 (100%) (ASI, BNSC, CNES, CSA, 
DLR, ESA, INPE, JAXA, NASA)
   ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  0 (0%)
                REJECT:  0 (0%)
  REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

Results are based on responses from 9 out of 10 members 
(90%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

FSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution:               CMC-R-2006-07-004
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Publish Document

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-P-2006-06-009: Authorization 
to publish update to Radio Frequency and Modulation 
Systems--Part 1: Earth Stations and Spacecraft (CCSDS 
401.0-B)

Results of CMC poll beginning 30 June 2006 and ending 14 
July 2006:

                 ADOPT:  9 (100%) (ASI, BNSC, CNES, CSA, 
DLR, ESA, INPE, JAXA, NASA)
   ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  0 (0%)
                REJECT:  0 (0%)
  REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

Results are based on responses from 9 out of 10 members 
(90%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

FSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted
Resulting CMC Resolution:               CMC-R-2006-07-005
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Publish Document

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CMC E-Poll Identifier:  CMC-P-2006-06-010: Authorization 
to approve update to the RF and Modulation Working Group 
charter

Results of CMC poll beginning 30 June 2006 and ending 14 
July 2006:

                 ADOPT:  6 (66.67%) (ASI, CSA, ESA, INPE, 
JAXA, NASA)
   ADOPT PROVISIONALLY:  3 (33.33%) (BNSC, CNES, DLR)
                REJECT:  0 (0%)
  REJECT WITH COMMENTS:  0 (0%)

      BNSC:  A question rather than a provisional 
acceptance. Is it permitted to have TBCs in a charter? 
There are several references to 22GHZ (TBC) in the 
proposed charter.
      CNES:  - The calendar objective of the WG for the 
S+Ka in Moon Mission seems not compliant with the 
implementation schedule of such missions ; the WG schedule 
should be revisited or we will get orange books and not 
blue books in this domain.
- It should be indicated how the group will consider the 
Modulation and Coding techniques in one work, as these two 
are correlated in the proposed activities (spread 
spectrum, BEM, ...).
- The TBC on the 22 Ghz frequency is to be explained.
- The 412 and 413 in April 2009 should read Green and not 
Blue.
      DLR:  - as no technical risks have been identified 
it cannot be understood, why the work is scheduled untill 
2010.
- please identify a bookkeeper for each of the 
deliverables (at least define this to any of the 
paricipating agencies)
- add a list of provided resources per agency and year
- delete activities, where the work is no yet estimated 
unless one of the supporting agencies states to provide 
the resources for this activities.


Results are based on responses from 9 out of 10 members 
(90%).

No response was received from the following Agencies:

FSA

Secretariat Interpretation of Results:  Adopted 
Provisionally
Resulting CMC Resolution:               TBD
Inferred Secretariat Action:            Forward results