[Cesg-all] Fwd: Re: Review of new Space Link Protocols WG Charter

[Greg J Kazz]

Adrian,

My AD has approved the updated to my WG. See below. Would you please 
have  the CESG approve it?

These RIDs came out on Sept. 5, 2003. It's been 3 weeks since they were 
sent to the secretariat for publication.

I followed the CESG procedure. We need to disposition these RIDs at the 
Fall 2003 CCSDS meeting to ensure that ELECTRA is backward compatible with 
MEX and ODY. We don't need a BOF on that topic.

As I stated before in my previous email message, the impact to the NASA/JPL 
ELECTRA project  due to these RIDs is significant. The fact that ELECTRA 
transceiver is a multi-mission project and looked upon as a multi-agency 
capability is another important reason to have this WG disposition these RIDs.

Greg

>Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:08:54 +0100
>From: Jean-Luc.Gerner@esa.int
>Subject: Re: Review of new Space Link Protocols WG Charter
>To: Greg J Kazz <Greg.J.Kazz@jpl.nasa.gov>
>Cc: Adrian.J.Hooke@jpl.nasa.gov
>X-Lotus-FromDomain: ESA
>
>Greg,
>As already said, no objection from my side. The new version of the charter is
>fine with me.
>Adrian, is it fine with you?
>regards
>Greg J Kazz <greg.j.kazz@jpl.nasa.gov> on 09/24/2003 04:50:27 PM
>
>To:  Jean-Luc.Gerner@esa.int, Adrian.J.Hooke@jpl.nasa.gov
>cc:  Peter.M.Shames@jpl.nasa.gov, Wallace.S.Tai@jpl.nasa.gov
>
>
>Subject:  Re: Review of new Space Link Protocols WG Charter
>
>
>Jean-Luc, Adrian,
>
>Answering Jean-Luc's reply below:
>
>I have submitted changes to the SLS Space Protocols WG which basically
>includes review and disposition of RIDs written against existing or
>emerging CCSDS link layer protocol recommendations.
>
>Proximity-1 Space Link Protocol was split into three new blue books and
>published and released on the CCSDS Web site in August 2003 as per the MC
>directive. It's not a question of releasing these documents for
>international review. They have already been released.
>
>The NASA/JPL ELECTRA Project waited until the new restructured proximity-1
>books were out before they submitted their RIDs to me, the NASA coordinator
>for RIDs against these documents. The SLS Space Link Protocols WG needs to
>discuss and provide a disposition of these RIDS at the Fall 2002 meeting.
>
>Can we get this WG updated charter approved so that the CCSDS secretariat
>can put these RIDs on the CCSDS web site for international agency review ASAP?
>
>thanks,
>
>Greg
>
>
>
>
>At 9/23/2003 06:58 PM, you wrote:
> >Greg,
> >In this case, as I understand, these new books require to go through agency
> >review to give also other agencies the chance to review and comments the
> >documents. I may not be fully clear of how things should be handled but my
> >feeling is that Adrian might request that the request for extra agency 
> review
> >goes to the CESG. I will inquire Adrian about this.
> >regards
> >Jean-Luc