<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252"><title>Kickoff</title>
</head>
<body>
<font face="Lucida Grande"><span style="font-size:11pt">All,<br>
Thanks for subscribing to the mailing list. In approximately one month, I’ll report to Adrian the membership of this list and hopefully any pros/cons we jointly discuss regarding addressing reconfigurable platforms within CCSDS.<br>
<br>
What may be an instructive exercise is to consider how Prox-1 may be implemented and fielded on two separately developed/provided SDRs. What would need to be clarified for waveform developers and/or system integrators to ensure interoperability? Would it be limited to a common lexicon for SDRs, or perhaps more? Is a reference architecture necessary with clearly articulated and supported functions? These are just a few questions to get a dialogue going.<br>
<br>
Perhaps such a dialogue would help us understand 1) the necessity (or lack thereof) of an SDR WG, 2) the bounds of such a group, and 3) the objectives of such a group.<br>
<br>
As a matter of reference, the content of the STRS Architecture lunchtime talk during the Spring CCSDS meeting in Portsmouth, VA can be found here:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://public.ccsds.org/meetings/2010Spring/Tech/lunchtime/Foore-CCSDS%20STRS%20Presentation%20May%203rd.pdf">http://public.ccsds.org/meetings/2010Spring/Tech/lunchtime/Foore-CCSDS%20STRS%20Presentation%20May%203rd.pdf</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks again,<br>
Larry</span></font>
</body>
</html>